Website review, no card needed

untitledgroup.com.au logo

untitledgroup.com.au website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202640 issues · 84 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on untitledgroup.com.au, 15 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.5 s797 msMay 2Oct 171.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 2026879 ms
May 9, 2026899 ms
May 16, 20261.0 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.1 s
Jun 6, 20261.1 s
Jun 13, 20261.0 s
Jun 20, 20261.0 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.3 s
Jul 11, 20261.4 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Jul 25, 20261.4 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.1 s
Aug 22, 20261.0 s
Aug 29, 2026933 ms
Sep 5, 20261.0 s
Sep 12, 20261.1 s
Sep 19, 20261.2 s
Sep 26, 20261.3 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
155 ms102 msMay 2Oct 17128 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026108 ms
May 9, 2026120 ms
May 16, 2026121 ms
May 23, 2026129 ms
May 30, 2026129 ms
Jun 6, 2026121 ms
Jun 13, 2026121 ms
Jun 20, 2026137 ms
Jun 27, 2026139 ms
Jul 4, 2026149 ms
Jul 11, 2026144 ms
Jul 18, 2026112 ms
Jul 25, 2026123 ms
Aug 1, 2026123 ms
Aug 8, 2026129 ms
Aug 22, 2026131 ms
Aug 29, 2026126 ms
Sep 5, 2026124 ms
Sep 12, 2026120 ms
Sep 19, 2026130 ms
Sep 26, 2026130 ms
Oct 3, 2026129 ms
Oct 10, 2026129 ms
Oct 17, 2026128 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of untitledgroup.com.au (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. untitledgroup.com.au at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. untitledgroup.com.au at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. untitledgroup.com.au at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. untitledgroup.com.au at 2.4 s2.4 s
  5. untitledgroup.com.au at 3.0 s3.0 s
  6. untitledgroup.com.au at 3.7 s3.7 s
  7. untitledgroup.com.au at 4.3 s4.3 s
  8. untitledgroup.com.au at 4.9 s4.9 s

Speed

11 to fix45
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.6 s · 26.7 MB

    27 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (26.7 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    3.4 s · 14.1 MB

    23 images could be 14.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.4 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 45

    45/100

    Your mobile performance score is 45 (desktop: 70). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, website-files.com and Facebook and others), adding 42.7 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.

  • website-files.com adds 334 ms

    334 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 334 ms of main-thread work and 41.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 329 KiB

    About 329 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 651 ms

    651 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 651 ms of main-thread work and 481 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Facebook adds 301 ms

    301 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 301 ms of main-thread work and 238 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 299 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 23 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 17 KiB

    About 17 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 70 but mobile only 45. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify CSS

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 47.6 s

    47.6 s

    Your largest element takes 47.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 52.0 s

    52.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 52.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.6 s

    9.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 39% slower for real visitors

    +39%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 546 ms

    546 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 546 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 108 ms to 128 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 120 ms

    120 ms

    Real visitors wait 120 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 308 ms

    308 ms

    Real visitors wait 308 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007

    0.007

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix35
  • Page weight: 42.8 MB in 220 requests

    42.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 42.8 MB in 220 requests on a phone: media 26.2 MB (21), images 15.3 MB (52) and scripts 1.1 MB (31). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 2.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    2.3 MB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 6abb3fbc9119f7aca6ad4dd7_SF_NAT_scarcity_1080x1350.webp at 1,080 px wide, shown at 145 px. Resized copies would save about 2.3 MB.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (447 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 12.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    12.14 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 12.14 g of CO₂e: 1456.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8492
  • 26 tap targets too small

    26 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 18 text elements with low contrast

    18 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (49 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 49 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h6, h2 → h6 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 70 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 32 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 37 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 32 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10076
  • Title is short (14 characters)

    Your title is only 14 characters: “Untitled Group”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (241 characters)

    Your meta description is 241 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://untitledgroup.com.au/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 69 internal links, 20 external

    The homepage links to 69 pages on untitledgroup.com.au and 20 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Untitled Group is Australia’s largest independently-owned music and events company, known as the driving force behind s…”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://untitledgroup.com.au/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (597 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://untitledgroup.com.au/events-tours/anyma, https://untitledgroup.com.au/events-tours/mina, https://untitledgroup.com.au/events-tours/oddmob, https://untitledgroup.com.au/events-tours/louistomlinson and https://untitledgroup.com.au/events-tours/sonnyfodera have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://untitledgroup.com.au/festivals and https://untitledgroup.com.au/events-tours use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://untitledgroup.com.au/festivals, https://untitledgroup.com.au/events-tours, https://untitledgroup.com.au/management, https://untitledgroup.com.au/bookings, https://untitledgroup.com.au/influencer-agency and https://untitledgroup.com.au/about and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 46 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix60
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 501 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 501 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Subscribe”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and TikTok Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and The Trade Desk and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 20 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at untitledgroup.com.au, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on untitledgroup.com.au, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25