Website review, no card needed

vice.com logo

vice.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202630 issues · 71 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on vice.com, 13 of them high impact, across 71 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.8 s1.6 sApr 18Oct 31.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20261.7 s
Apr 25, 20261.7 s
May 2, 20261.7 s
May 9, 20261.7 s
May 16, 20261.6 s
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
165 ms141 msApr 18Oct 3144 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026162 ms
Apr 25, 2026162 ms
May 2, 2026158 ms
May 9, 2026150 ms
May 16, 2026147 ms
May 23, 2026146 ms
May 30, 2026146 ms
Jun 6, 2026152 ms
Jun 13, 2026151 ms
Jun 20, 2026152 ms
Jun 27, 2026149 ms
Jul 4, 2026148 ms
Jul 11, 2026149 ms
Jul 18, 2026147 ms
Jul 25, 2026150 ms
Aug 1, 2026148 ms
Aug 8, 2026148 ms
Aug 15, 2026150 ms
Aug 22, 2026149 ms
Aug 29, 2026150 ms
Sep 5, 2026149 ms
Sep 12, 2026146 ms
Sep 19, 2026145 ms
Sep 26, 2026144 ms
Oct 3, 2026144 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of vice.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. vice.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. vice.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. vice.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. vice.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. vice.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  6. vice.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  7. vice.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  8. vice.com at 3.3 s3.3 s

Speed

4 to fix51
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.9 s · 1.0 MB

    About 1.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Avoid multiple page redirects

    5.7 s

    The page goes through 2 redirects before it starts loading, costing about 5.7 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.

  • Mobile performance score: 51

    51/100

    Your mobile performance score is 51 (desktop: 67). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Main-thread work: 2.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 145 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 11 ms

    11 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 11 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 37.0 s

    37.0 s

    Your largest element takes 37.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 37.1 s

    37.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 37.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.1 s

    7.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 13.5 s

    13.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 225 ms

    225 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 225 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 145 ms

    145 ms

    Real visitors wait 145 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% faster for real visitors

    -11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 162 ms to 144 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 5.1 MB in 223 requests

    5.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 223 requests on a phone: scripts 2.9 MB (81), images 1.8 MB (51) and fonts 187 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    12 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Copy-of-Copy-of-Copy-of-Copy-of-Copy-of-Copy-of-Copy-of-Copy at 389 px wide, shown at 124 px. Resized copies would save about 12 KiB.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.46 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.46 g of CO₂e: 175.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9694
  • 10 tap targets too small

    10 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (2 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 5 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10090
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Subscribe to VICE” and “VICE”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (201 characters)

    Your meta description is 201 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 51 internal links, 15 external

    The homepage links to 51 pages on vice.com and 15 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 64 characters

    Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “VICE - VICE is the definitive guide to enlightening information.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.vice.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.vice.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix75
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    16%

    A phone browser shows 1,142 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 180. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.vice.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 14 pages without a meta description

    https://www.vice.com/id, https://www.vice.com/cs, https://www.vice.com/da, https://www.vice.com/de, https://www.vice.com/es and https://www.vice.com/fr and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 42 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

5 to fixGoogle 5469
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://trx-hub.com/i/m/i.png?q=N4IghgLhBOD6BmB7aB3M0AmBLAdgcxAC5gBfAGhAFsBTCMDSMI0iiLS3A48kAV2gA2AZ2Y9IMWGAAOU6jgyiKUsHmqwYYAMbUiAbVBDE-bURAALKFKGEA9DZQOAdADcs2x5sSUbcmyArQ1PDU0IHQphYQVrb2Tq7unt7+4FB.

  • 22 small tap targets

    22 of 48 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 2 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“The Topics API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).

  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot set properties of null (setting 'id')”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,142 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,142 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LOGIN / SIGN UP” and “SUBSCRIBE”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Join Now” and “Subscribe”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight and TikTok Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 12 trackers load before any consent

    12

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 7 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 28 cookies set on arrival

    28

    Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 98 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 98 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vice.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on vice.com, including 12 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25