Website review, no card needed
vix.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202649 issues · 91 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on vix.com, 19 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 18.2 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
58FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 197 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 196 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 254 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 211 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Main-thread work: 18.2 s
A phone's processor spends 18.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 9.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 688 KiBAbout 688 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
px-cloud.net adds 1.1 s
1.1 spx-cloud.net costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 299 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 34
34/100Your mobile performance score is 34. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (px-cloud.net, Google Tag Manager and Clarity and others), adding 1.5 MB and 3.2 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 851 ms
851 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 851 ms of main-thread work and 523 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
900 ms5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
714 KiB23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (714 KiB).
Clarity adds 503 ms
503 msClarity costs a phone 503 ms of main-thread work and 28 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 401 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
370 KiB12 images could be 370 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Segment adds 280 ms
280 msSegment costs a phone 280 ms of main-thread work and 154 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 50 KiBAbout 50 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
75 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 75 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Duplicated JavaScript
3 KiB3 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
1 checks passed
Server response: 14 ms
14 msYour server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 1.37
1.37For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.37 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 18.2 s
18.2 sYour largest element takes 18.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Hero Image | ViX”.
Speed Index: 16.3 s
16.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 16.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 30.3 s
30.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 30.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.1 s
2.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 223 ms
223 msReal visitors wait 223 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 197 ms to 211 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 595 ms
595 msReal visitors wait 595 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.084
0.084The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.084, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.6 MB in 305 requests
5.6 MBYour homepage downloads 5.6 MB in 305 requests on a phone: scripts 2.3 MB (60), other files 2.2 MB (144) and images 904 KiB (86). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
bf6979df49b548429111c12b40edd6a5 is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.59 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.59 g of CO₂e: 190.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (32 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 32 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
10 tap targets too small
10 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
ARIA progressbar nodes must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA progressbar nodes must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (7 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 62 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 11 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (21 characters)
Your title is only 21 characters: “Ver On Demand por ViX”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
30 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 30 pages on vix.com and 7 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 109 characters
Your meta description is 109 characters: “Disfruta de los contenidos de On Demand por ViX. Las mejores series, novelas y películas en Español y gratis.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “VIX”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://vix.com/es-es.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://vix.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://vix.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (203 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
5 pages share 2 titles
https://vix.com/es-es, / and https://vix.com/ondemand all use the title “Ver On Demand por ViX”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 15 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /, whose canonical is https://vix.com/es-es. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
4 pages share a meta description
/ and https://vix.com/ondemand use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page without an H1
https://vix.com/registro has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://vix.com/registro has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 29 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 401 ()”.
21 distorted images
21 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
86 of 97 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 169 words
The homepage has only about 169 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Segment (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
14 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at vix.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Hosting
- Google Cloud
Company
- Founded
- 1999
- Headquarters
- Coral Gables
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 49 issues on vix.com, including 21 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.