Website review, no card needed

wrc.com logo

wrc.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202639 issues · 85 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on wrc.com, 16 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.3 s965 msMay 2Oct 171.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.0 s
May 9, 20261.0 s
May 16, 20261.0 s
May 23, 20261.1 s
May 30, 20261.1 s
Jun 6, 20261.2 s
Jun 13, 20261.3 s
Jun 20, 20261.3 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.2 s
Jul 18, 20261.1 s
Jul 25, 20261.2 s
Aug 1, 20261.1 s
Aug 8, 20261.1 s
Aug 15, 20261.1 s
Aug 22, 20261.1 s
Aug 29, 20261.2 s
Sep 5, 20261.2 s
Sep 12, 20261.2 s
Sep 19, 20261.1 s
Sep 26, 20261.2 s
Oct 3, 20261.1 s
Oct 10, 20261.0 s
Oct 17, 20261.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
200 ms149 msMay 2Oct 17155 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026181 ms
May 9, 2026186 ms
May 16, 2026186 ms
May 23, 2026181 ms
May 30, 2026185 ms
Jun 6, 2026169 ms
Jun 13, 2026164 ms
Jun 20, 2026164 ms
Jun 27, 2026184 ms
Jul 4, 2026187 ms
Jul 11, 2026187 ms
Jul 18, 2026188 ms
Jul 25, 2026173 ms
Aug 1, 2026180 ms
Aug 8, 2026179 ms
Aug 15, 2026177 ms
Aug 22, 2026178 ms
Aug 29, 2026184 ms
Sep 5, 2026190 ms
Sep 12, 2026194 ms
Sep 19, 2026188 ms
Sep 26, 2026177 ms
Oct 3, 2026174 ms
Oct 10, 2026157 ms
Oct 17, 2026155 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wrc.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wrc.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. wrc.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. wrc.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  4. wrc.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  5. wrc.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  6. wrc.com at 5.4 s5.4 s
  7. wrc.com at 6.3 s6.3 s
  8. wrc.com at 7.2 s7.2 s

Speed

8 to fix48
  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 s · 230 KiB

    10 images could be 230 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 54). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.6 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    666 KiB

    About 666 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    545 KiB

    27 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (545 KiB).

  • Main-thread work: 3.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon, redbull.com and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.5 MB and 145 ms of main-thread time.

  • redbull.com adds 68 ms

    68 ms

    redbull.com costs a phone 68 ms of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 27 ms

    27 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 27 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 15.6 s

    15.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.1 s

    6.1 s

    Your largest element takes 6.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 6.3 s

    6.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 192 ms

    192 ms

    Real visitors wait 192 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 445 ms

    445 ms

    Real visitors wait 445 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 15% faster for real visitors

    -15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 181 ms to 155 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.3 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.01

    0.01

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.01, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 2.5 MB in 136 requests

    2.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 136 requests on a phone: scripts 1.3 MB (80), images 927 KiB (30) and fonts 184 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    132 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example hand-second-0DUaXLKw.png at 251 px wide, shown at 13 px. Resized copies would save about 132 KiB.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (206 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (39 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.71 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.71 g of CO₂e: 85.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8588
  • Images must have alternative text (12 elements)

    Images must have alternative text: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 8 tap targets too small

    8 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links must have discernible text (1 element)

    Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (6 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 9 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9289
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 11 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 11 pages on wrc.com and 2 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 132 characters

    Your meta description is 132 characters: “Stay updated with WRC news, live updates, and timing. Discover upcoming events, results, championship standings and dri…”.

  • Title: 65 characters

    Your title is a healthy 65 characters: “Home | WRC.com® | FIA World Rally Championship | Official Website”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.wrc.com/en.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebPage.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.wrc.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    10%

    A phone browser shows 853 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 88. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.wrc.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

5 to fix63
  • 7 pages without a title

    https://www.wrc.com/en/news, https://www.wrc.com/en/teams-and-drivers, https://www.wrc.com/live-timing, https://www.wrc.com/en/misc/game, https://www.wrc.com/en/news/katsuta-plans-to-keep-pushing-after-breakthrough-season and https://www.wrc.com/en/events/wrc-rallye-monte-carlo-2027/itinerary-wrc-rallye-monte-carlo-2027 and 1 other have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.wrc.com/en and / all use the title “Home | WRC.com® | FIA World Rally Championship | Official Website”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 9 pages without a meta description

    https://www.wrc.com/en/news, https://www.wrc.com/en/calendar, https://www.wrc.com/en/results-and-standings, https://www.wrc.com/en/teams-and-drivers, https://www.wrc.com/live-timing and https://www.wrc.com/en/misc/game and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /, whose canonical is https://www.wrc.com/en. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 8 pages without an H1

    /, https://www.wrc.com/en/news, https://www.wrc.com/en/teams-and-drivers, https://www.wrc.com/live-timing, https://www.wrc.com/en/misc/game and https://www.wrc.com/en/news/katsuta-plans-to-keep-pushing-after-breakthrough-season and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    / has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 10 internal pages checked

    We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 10 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9691
  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 23 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 6 distorted images

    6 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix40
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 853 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 853 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

1 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Shop”.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wrc.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Vue.js

Company

Founded
1973

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on wrc.com, including 13 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25