Website review, no card needed

wral.com logo

wral.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202646 issues · 102 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on wral.com, 20 of them high impact, across 102 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s1.3 sApr 18Oct 31.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20261.9 s
Apr 25, 20261.9 s
May 2, 20261.9 s
May 9, 20261.9 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
166 ms131 msApr 18Oct 3144 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026138 ms
Apr 25, 2026145 ms
May 2, 2026147 ms
May 9, 2026144 ms
May 16, 2026140 ms
May 23, 2026136 ms
May 30, 2026135 ms
Jun 6, 2026135 ms
Jun 13, 2026141 ms
Jun 20, 2026149 ms
Jun 27, 2026157 ms
Jul 4, 2026162 ms
Jul 11, 2026159 ms
Jul 18, 2026154 ms
Jul 25, 2026150 ms
Aug 1, 2026146 ms
Aug 8, 2026147 ms
Aug 15, 2026152 ms
Aug 22, 2026157 ms
Aug 29, 2026159 ms
Sep 5, 2026156 ms
Sep 12, 2026150 ms
Sep 19, 2026146 ms
Sep 26, 2026144 ms
Oct 3, 2026144 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wral.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wral.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. wral.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. wral.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. wral.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. wral.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. wral.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. wral.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. wral.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

15 to fix28
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    9.1 s · 3.2 MB

    About 3.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 9.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.6 s · 3.3 MB

    213 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.3 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • confiant-integrations.net adds 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    confiant-integrations.net costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 13.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 13.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 7.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 28

    28/100

    Your mobile performance score is 28. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 3,672 HTML elements

    The page has 3,672 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (confiant-integrations.net, Taboola and ops.co and others), adding 5.1 MB and 3.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    550 ms · 758 KiB

    17 images could be 758 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 550 ms faster on a phone.

  • Taboola adds 557 ms

    557 ms

    Taboola costs a phone 557 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 469 ms

    469 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 469 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • ops.co adds 536 ms

    536 ms

    ops.co costs a phone 536 ms of main-thread work and 563 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 481 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 96 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 96 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Rubicon Project adds 360 ms

    360 ms

    Rubicon Project costs a phone 360 ms of main-thread work and 113 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    54 KiB

    About 54 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • First Contentful Paint: 10.0 s

    10.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 10.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 26.0 s

    26.0 s

    Your largest element takes 26.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Speed Index: 15.7 s

    15.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 74.1 s

    74.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 74.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 138 ms to 144 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 135 ms

    135 ms

    Real visitors wait 135 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 308 ms

    308 ms

    Real visitors wait 308 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 20% faster for real visitors

    -20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.035

    0.035

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.035, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 10.2 MB in 1,344 requests

    10.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.2 MB in 1,344 requests on a phone: scripts 6.3 MB (132), media 1.3 MB (4) and images 1.2 MB (443). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    52 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example thumbnail at 1,248 px wide, shown at 116 px. Resized copies would save about 52 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (56 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 2.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.90 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.90 g of CO₂e: 348.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

12 to fixGoogle 8286
  • Images must have alternative text (1 element)

    Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 30 text elements with low contrast

    30 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (8 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 61 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 12 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 6995
  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 170 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 170 pages on wral.com and 6 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 137 characters

    Your meta description is 137 characters: “Raleigh breaking news and weather, Raleigh North Carolina news today, WRAL 7-day forecasts, NC lottery updates. WRAL ne…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “WRAL News – Raleigh, NC Breaking News and Weather”.

  • Title: 37 characters

    Your title is a healthy 37 characters: “WRAL | News and Weather in Raleigh NC”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.wral.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: NewsMediaOrganization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.wral.com/news-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Parts of the site are closed to 6 AI crawlers

    Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.wral.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

2 checks passed
  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,733 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 4 pages with very little text

    https://www.wral.com/news/local/photos-nc-storm-damage-tornado-warnings-october-2026, https://www.wral.com/video/wral-news-plus/20364185, https://www.wral.com/video/forecast-raleigh-durham-fayetteville and https://www.wral.com/news/local/mobile-home-destroyed-fire-sampson-county-october-2026 have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 149 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

5 to fixGoogle 2773
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://ams-pageview-public.s3.amazonaws.com/1x1-pixel.png?id=ae4b63f97dd4.

  • 27 third-party cookies

    27 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“The Topics API is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.”).

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “window._init_marketwatch is not a function”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

  • Requests the notification permission on page load

    Requests the notification permission on page load.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    18 of 20 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix60
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,889 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,889 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “5 On Your Side: What to buy in October” and “WRAL Daily Download”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 23 cookies set on arrival

    23

    Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 92 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 92 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wral.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on wral.com, including 21 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25