Website review, no card needed
wren.co website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202642 issues · 84 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on wren.co, 13 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 20.1 MB in 98 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 228 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 250 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 248 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 246 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
cloudfront.net adds 1.6 s
1.6 scloudfront.net costs a phone 1.6 s of main-thread work and 660 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 36
36/100Your mobile performance score is 36. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 9.6 s
A phone's processor spends 9.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (cloudfront.net, rsms.me and Contentful and others), adding 21.3 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
450 ms · 1.2 MB29 images could be 1.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.4 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
imgix adds 0 ms
0 msimgix costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 13.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
750 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.
ctfassets.net adds 0 ms
0 msctfassets.net costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 6.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
316 KiBAbout 316 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
rsms.me adds 2 ms
2 msrsms.me costs a phone 2 ms of main-thread work and 559 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
34 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 34 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Reduce unused CSS
13 KiBAbout 13 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2 KiB1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2 KiB).
1 checks passed
Server response: 34 ms
34 msYour server sent the HTML in 34 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 26.5 s
26.5 sYour largest element takes 26.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Volunteers planting trees in a reforestation effort.”.
Time to Interactive: 31.2 s
31.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 31.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.7 s
2.7 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 5.9 s
5.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 240 ms
240 msReal visitors wait 240 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 943 ms
943 msReal visitors wait 943 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
22 images without width and height
22 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.122
0.122The layout shifts by 0.122 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 228 ms to 246 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.10
0.10For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.10 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 20.1 MB in 98 requests
20.1 MBYour homepage downloads 20.1 MB in 98 requests on a phone: images 15.2 MB (58), media 3.2 MB (5) and fonts 998 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
6 images over 500 KB
6 images weigh 12.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
10 images far larger than shown
6.2 MB10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Untitled--1-.png at 1,920 px wide, shown at 340 px. Resized copies would save about 6.2 MB.
24 images below the first screen load straight away
24 images further down the page (13.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
3 images in older formats
3 images (6.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 5.7 g of CO₂ per visit
5.69 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.69 g of CO₂e: 682.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
24 text elements with low contrast
24 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
14 links without text
14 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes
Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes (5 elements).
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“.css-15yjr4j{-webkit-background-clip:text;backgro…” and “Wren is the platform for climate action.”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.wren.co/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
37 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 37 pages on wren.co and 9 external pages.
3 checks passed
Meta description: 98 characters
Your meta description is 98 characters: “Wren helps you calculate and offset your personal carbon emissions through a monthly subscription.”.
Title: 38 characters
Your title is a healthy 38 characters: “Wren | Systemic change starts with you”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
29%A phone browser shows 2,039 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 600. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.wren.co/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
4 pages share a title
https://www.wren.co/continue, https://www.wren.co/blog, https://www.wren.co/calculator and https://www.wren.co/offset-anything all use the title “Wren | Offset your carbon footprint”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
5 pages share a meta description
https://www.wren.co/continue, https://www.wren.co/blog, https://www.wren.co/actions, https://www.wren.co/calculator and https://www.wren.co/offset-anything use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 pages without an H1
https://www.wren.co/continue, https://www.wren.co/teams/business, https://www.wren.co/collective, https://www.wren.co/blog, https://www.wren.co/blog/wren-partners-with-bezero and https://www.wren.co/blog/wren-partners-with-kita and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 23 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
13 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
About 2,039 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,039 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get started” and “Start now”.
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Start now”, “Learn more” and “Contact us”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 2 customer or partner logos and 2 trust badges.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wren.co, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Hosting
- Heroku
Hiring
- Hiring
- 1 open role
- Job board
- smartrecruiters
- Careers page
- www.wren.co/careers (opens in a new tab)
Company
- Headquarters
- San Jose
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on wren.co, including 20 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.