Website review, no card needed

wrenchgroup.com logo

wrenchgroup.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202620 issues · 79 checks

This review found 20 issues worth fixing on wrenchgroup.com, 4 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 6.7 MB in 90 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s608 msMay 2Oct 17934 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.7 s
May 9, 20262.7 s
May 16, 20262.6 s
May 23, 20262.6 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.7 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.2 s
Oct 10, 2026885 ms
Oct 17, 2026934 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
90 ms67 msMay 2Oct 1075 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202670 ms
May 9, 202671 ms
May 16, 202671 ms
May 23, 202679 ms
May 30, 202679 ms
Jun 6, 202684 ms
Jun 13, 202687 ms
Jun 20, 202681 ms
Jun 27, 202679 ms
Jul 4, 202680 ms
Jul 11, 202675 ms
Jul 18, 202679 ms
Jul 25, 202684 ms
Aug 1, 202678 ms
Aug 8, 202679 ms
Aug 15, 202679 ms
Aug 22, 202678 ms
Aug 29, 202679 ms
Sep 5, 202679 ms
Sep 12, 202675 ms
Sep 19, 202674 ms
Sep 26, 202675 ms
Oct 3, 202671 ms
Oct 10, 202675 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of wrenchgroup.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. wrenchgroup.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. wrenchgroup.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. wrenchgroup.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. wrenchgroup.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. wrenchgroup.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  6. wrenchgroup.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  7. wrenchgroup.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  8. wrenchgroup.com at 3.3 s3.3 s

Speed

1 to fix98
  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 5.9 MB

    32 images could be 5.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    135 KiB

    About 135 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Adobe Tag Manager and adobedc.net), adding 56 KiB and 70 ms of main-thread time.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 61 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    39 KiB

    1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (39 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    19 KiB

    About 19 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 98

    98/100

    Your mobile performance score is 98 (desktop: 100). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 1.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 235 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

2 to fix100
  • 48 images without width and height

    48 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Time to Interactive: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 70 ms to 75 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

11 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors wait 1.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.08

    0.08

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.6 s

    0.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 370 ms

    370 ms

    Real visitors wait 370 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 66% faster for real visitors

    -66%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Your largest element renders in 2.4 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.037

    0.037

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.037, good is under 0.1).

  • Speed Index: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 1.2 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 6 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix28
  • Page weight: 6.7 MB in 90 requests

    6.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.7 MB in 90 requests on a phone: images 6.3 MB (39), fonts 211 KiB (6) and scripts 147 KiB (20). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 7 images over 500 KB

    7 images weigh 5.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 10 images far larger than shown

    2.7 MB

    10 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example media_1e79ff8a8b222b9f83f014324e8620fabdebd4a96.jpg at 700 px wide, shown at 166 px. Resized copies would save about 2.7 MB.

  • 35 images below the first screen load straight away

    35 images further down the page (6.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.91 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.91 g of CO₂e: 228.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9797
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 38 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10082
  • Title is short (27 characters)

    Your title is only 27 characters: “Wrench Group - Wrench Group”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (270 characters)

    Your meta description is 270 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 7 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 7 pages on wrenchgroup.com and 0 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “The Standard in Home Services”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.wrenchgroup.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.wrenchgroup.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.wrenchgroup.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (321 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.wrenchgroup.com/our-story, https://www.wrenchgroup.com/contact and https://www.wrenchgroup.com/brands have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.wrenchgroup.com/contact has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 3 internal pages checked

    We fetched 3 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 3 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 3 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 3 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7377
  • Scrolls sideways on phones

    On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.

  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 small tap target

    1 of 5 tappable elements near the top of the page is smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix90
  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 352 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 352 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “START A CONVERSATION”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Start a Conversation”, “Contact Us” and “Start the Conversation”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge and “2.5 M+ Customers”.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at wrenchgroup.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 20 issues on wrenchgroup.com, including 3 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25