Website review, no card needed
xtremepush.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202621 issues · 68 checks
This review found 21 issues worth fixing on xtremepush.com, 8 of them high impact, across 68 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
86BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 155 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 157 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 160 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 162 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 100
100/100Your mobile performance score is 100 (desktop: 100). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 0.0 s
A phone's processor spends 0.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 4 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 3.3 s
3.3 sReal visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 155 ms to 162 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Real-user INP: 158 ms
158 msReal visitors wait 158 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.04
0.04For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
First Contentful Paint: 0.8 s
0.8 sThe first text or image appears after 0.8 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Largest Contentful Paint: 0.8 s
0.8 sYour largest element renders in 0.8 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “You’ve been blocked for security reasons”.
Speed Index: 0.9 s
0.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 0.9 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 0.8 s
0.8 sThe page is fully interactive after 0.8 s.
Images and page weight
1 image over 500 KB
main-1.png weighs 604 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
11 images far larger than shown
740 KiB11 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example main-1.png at 1,612 px wide, shown at 351 px. Resized copies would save about 740 KiB.
9 images in older formats
9 images (1.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Crew.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (375 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.00 g of CO₂ per visit
0.00 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.00 g of CO₂e: 0.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Page weight: 1 KiB in 1 request
1 KiBYour homepage downloads 1 KiB in 1 request on a phone: HTML 1 KiB (1). That is a lean page.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Images must have alternative text (1 element)
Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
17 text elements with low contrast
17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
1 checks passed
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Error status code
The page answers with an error status, so search engines may drop it.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (FAQPage, Organization and SoftwareApplication) but with 1 problem, for example “SoftwareApplication: no offers (price) block”.
61 internal links, 13 external
The homepage links to 61 pages on xtremepush.com and 13 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 122 characters
Your meta description is 122 characters: “Turn visitors into loyal players with real-time data, AI and gamification. Channels include; web, app & social engageme…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Introducing”.
Title: 58 characters
Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Xtremepush | CRM & Loyalty Marketing powered by InfinityAI”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.xtremepush.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.xtremepush.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.xtremepush.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,163 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
7 pages without a meta description
https://www.xtremepush.com/bi/computations, https://www.xtremepush.com/microsites-landing-page, https://www.xtremepush.com/ad-retargeting, https://www.xtremepush.com/real-time-sports-feed, https://www.xtremepush.com/omnichannel-orchestration and https://www.xtremepush.com/web-push and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 44 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'addEventListener')”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
9 of 10 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 977 words of copy
The homepage carries about 977 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Book a demo” and “Learn more”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 51 testimonial or review blocks, 2 customer or partner logos and 3 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and HubSpot and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
14 cookies set on arrival
14Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
34 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 34 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at xtremepush.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 21 issues on xtremepush.com, including 4 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.