Website review, no card needed

youngontop.com logo

youngontop.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202642 issues · 87 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on youngontop.com, 21 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
8.2 s2.8 sMay 2Oct 175.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.4 s
May 9, 20263.6 s
May 16, 20263.9 s
May 23, 20264.5 s
May 30, 20264.9 s
Jun 6, 20265.1 s
Jun 13, 20265.3 s
Jun 20, 20265.3 s
Jun 27, 20265.3 s
Jul 4, 20265.4 s
Jul 11, 20265.5 s
Jul 18, 20265.3 s
Jul 25, 20265.3 s
Aug 1, 20265.2 s
Aug 8, 20265.1 s
Aug 15, 20265.6 s
Aug 22, 20266.2 s
Aug 29, 20266.6 s
Sep 5, 20267.3 s
Sep 12, 20267.5 s
Sep 19, 20267.6 s
Sep 26, 20267.5 s
Oct 3, 20267.0 s
Oct 10, 20266.3 s
Oct 17, 20265.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
285 ms156 msMay 2Oct 17175 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026171 ms
May 9, 2026179 ms
May 16, 2026182 ms
May 23, 2026206 ms
May 30, 2026239 ms
Jun 6, 2026249 ms
Jun 13, 2026255 ms
Jun 20, 2026261 ms
Jun 27, 2026262 ms
Jul 4, 2026263 ms
Jul 11, 2026270 ms
Jul 18, 2026267 ms
Jul 25, 2026262 ms
Aug 1, 2026245 ms
Aug 8, 2026191 ms
Aug 15, 2026198 ms
Aug 22, 2026226 ms
Aug 29, 2026225 ms
Sep 5, 2026249 ms
Sep 12, 2026252 ms
Sep 19, 2026240 ms
Sep 26, 2026243 ms
Oct 3, 2026215 ms
Oct 10, 2026228 ms
Oct 17, 2026175 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of youngontop.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. youngontop.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. youngontop.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. youngontop.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. youngontop.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. youngontop.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. youngontop.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. youngontop.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. youngontop.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

6 to fix55
  • Improve image delivery

    11.8 s · 9.9 MB

    54 images could be 9.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 11.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    5.1 s

    65 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.1 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.8 s · 1.3 MB

    201 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.3 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.8 s · 335 KiB

    About 335 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 220 KiB

    About 220 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 55

    55/100

    Your mobile performance score is 55 (desktop: 65). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, datatables.net and Cloudflare and others), adding 432 KiB and 163 ms of main-thread time.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 126 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    22 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 2.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 636 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 14 ms

    14 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Real visitors wait 5.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 5.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 44.4 s

    44.4 s

    Your largest element takes 44.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “YOT telah menjangkau jutaan anak muda di 1.000+ kampus dan …”.

  • Speed Index: 16.0 s

    16.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 16.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 46.6 s

    46.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 46.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.1 s

    6.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 67% slower for real visitors

    +67%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 5.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 32 images without width and height

    32 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 15% slower for real visitors

    +15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 171 ms to 175 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 168 ms

    168 ms

    Real visitors wait 168 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 56 ms

    56 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 56 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 12.3 MB in 222 requests

    12.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 12.3 MB in 222 requests on a phone: images 10.8 MB (66), scripts 997 KiB (70) and stylesheets 403 KiB (73). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 37 images far larger than shown

    6.1 MB

    37 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Dania-scaled.jpeg at 2,038 px wide, shown at 99 px. Resized copies would save about 6.1 MB.

  • 8 images over 500 KB

    8 images weigh 5.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 40 images in older formats

    40 images (9.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 40 images below the first screen load straight away

    40 images further down the page (9.9 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.47 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.47 g of CO₂e: 416.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8890
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 12 links without text

    12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (6 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 58 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8571
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (19 characters)

    Your title is only 19 characters: “Home - Young On Top”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 41 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 41 pages on youngontop.com and 8 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://youngontop.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://youngontop.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://youngontop.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (503 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 11 pages without a meta description

    https://youngontop.com/about-us, https://youngontop.com/our-program, https://youngontop.com/events, https://youngontop.com/articles, https://youngontop.com/career and https://youngontop.com/store and 5 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 10 pages without an H1

    https://youngontop.com/about-us, https://youngontop.com/our-program, https://youngontop.com/events, https://youngontop.com/articles, https://youngontop.com/career and https://youngontop.com/store and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://youngontop.com/contact-us has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://youngontop.com/store took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • 10 small tap targets

    10 of 28 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://cloudflare.com/?ver=4.0.13' from origin 'https://youngontop.com' has been blocked …”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix60
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 58 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 550 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 550 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at youngontop.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on youngontop.com, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25