Website review, no card needed
ziebart.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202631 issues · 87 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on ziebart.com, 14 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 153 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 198 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
6.3 s8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.3 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.0 s · 962 KiBAbout 962 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.0 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.0 s · 577 KiB43 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (577 KiB).
audioeye.com adds 1.3 s
1.3 saudioeye.com costs a phone 1.3 s of main-thread work and 297 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 49
49/100Your mobile performance score is 49. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.6 s
A phone's processor spends 4.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (audioeye.com, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 2.1 MB and 2.5 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 638 ms
638 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 638 ms of main-thread work and 1,002 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 40 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 40 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Facebook adds 168 ms
168 msFacebook costs a phone 168 ms of main-thread work and 307 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
226 KiB2 images could be 226 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 130 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
28 KiBAbout 28 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Minify JavaScript
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 27 ms
27 msYour server sent the HTML in 27 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
First Contentful Paint: 10.3 s
10.3 sThe first text or image appears after 10.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 21.4 s
21.4 sYour largest element takes 21.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Your Vehicle's Best Defense”.
Time to Interactive: 24.6 s
24.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.8 s
12.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) got 30% slower for real visitors
+30%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 152 ms to 198 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 290 ms
290 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 290 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 194 ms
194 msReal visitors wait 194 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 665 ms
665 msReal visitors wait 665 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.2 MB in 127 requests
3.2 MBYour homepage downloads 3.2 MB in 127 requests on a phone: scripts 2.4 MB (61), images 616 KiB (15) and fonts 77 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
129 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example ziebart-logo.svg at 533 px wide, shown at 65 px. Resized copies would save about 129 KiB.
3 images in older formats
3 images (299 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (227 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.90 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.90 g of CO₂e: 108.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (22 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
119 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 119 pages on ziebart.com and 9 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 155 characters
Your meta description is 155 characters: “Ziebart brings back that new car feeling. With our innovative products, exceptional service and knowledgeable staff, we…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Your Local Automotive Expert”.
Title: 55 characters
Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Your Preferred Automotive Protection Provider | Ziebart”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.ziebart.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ziebart.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.ziebart.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (772 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 60 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://smartpixl.com/12645/00004_ziebart.com_SMART.GIF.
4 small tap targets
4 of 10 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 third-party cookies
3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 345 words of copy
The homepage carries about 345 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
10 calls to action
The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Request Appointment”, “Request Estimate” and “Contact Us”.
1 short form
A short form (5 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Meta Pixel, Microsoft Clarity and The Trade Desk (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
29 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ziebart.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Webflow
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Company
- Employees
- 103
- Founded
- 1959
- Headquarters
- Troy
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on ziebart.com, including 17 speed issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.