Website review, no card needed
zop.in website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202641 issues · 92 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on zop.in, 14 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72C- #81,620 of 104,722 reviewed websitesbeats 19%
- #49,890 of 58,656 online storesbeats 12%
- #46,522 of 53,423 Shopify storesbeats 11%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 211 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 211 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 242 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 240 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 249 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 253 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 260 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 265 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Main-thread work: 7.1 s
A phone's processor spends 7.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
4,469 HTML elements
The page has 4,469 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 2.5 MBAbout 2.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (pickrr.com, shiprocket.in and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 2.1 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 58
58/100Your mobile performance score is 58. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
800 ms4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.
pickrr.com adds 550 ms
550 mspickrr.com costs a phone 550 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
shiprocket.in adds 533 ms
533 msshiprocket.in costs a phone 533 ms of main-thread work and 120 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
15 long tasks on the main thread
15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 483 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Shopify adds 126 ms
126 msShopify costs a phone 126 ms of main-thread work and 379 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 172 KiB18 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (172 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 148 KiBAbout 148 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
64 KiB7 images could be 64 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Duplicated JavaScript
38 KiB38 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Minify JavaScript
21 KiB21 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 25 ms
25 msYour server sent the HTML in 25 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 20.0 s
20.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s
1.4 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.2 s
4.2 sYour largest element takes 4.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Hero banner”.
Real-user INP: 243 ms
243 msReal visitors wait 243 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 24% slower for real visitors
+24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 211 ms to 265 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Speed Index: 4.4 s
4.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
7 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 468 ms
468 msReal visitors wait 468 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 33% faster for real visitors
-33%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.7 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.021
0.021The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.021, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.3 MB in 318 requests
4.3 MBYour homepage downloads 4.3 MB in 318 requests on a phone: scripts 1.9 MB (70), other files 1.3 MB (153) and images 699 KiB (57). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.21 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.21 g of CO₂e: 145.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
90 tap targets too small
90 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
79 text elements with low contrast
79 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
13 form fields without a label
13 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (15 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (6 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings should not be empty (2 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (83 characters)
Your title is 83 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Online Discovery Platform | Shop From The Best D2C Brands – Shiprocket Merchant App”.
4 links crawlers can't follow
4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
348 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 348 pages on zop.in and 4 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 138 characters
Your meta description is 138 characters: “Best Online Shopping Site In India. Find Leading D2C Brands. Best Quality Fashion, Footwear, Beauty, Electronics, Home …”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.zop.in/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.zop.in/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
Parts of the site are closed to 2 AI crawlers
Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot) and ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.
2 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,182 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.zop.in/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 pages without an H1
https://www.zop.in/collections/lightning-deals, https://www.zop.in/collections/zop-bestsellers, https://www.zop.in/blogs/all, https://www.zop.in/collections/monsoon-deals, https://www.zop.in/products/tealight-candles-set-smokeless-candles-50-pcs-set and https://www.zop.in/products/premium-6-piece-led-flameless-candle-light-set-with-remote-control and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
14 pages with very little text
https://www.zop.in/collections/lightning-deals, https://www.zop.in/collections/zop-bestsellers, https://www.zop.in/collections/monsoon-deals, https://www.zop.in/products/tealight-candles-set-smokeless-candles-50-pcs-set, https://www.zop.in/products/premium-6-piece-led-flameless-candle-light-set-with-remote-control and https://www.zop.in/products/diwali-ki-saugat-hamper and 8 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 161 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.zop.in/.
87 small tap targets
87 of 144 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
7 third-party cookies
7 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “"serviceworker" must be a dictionary in your web app manifest.”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,947 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,947 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Get in touch”, “Return/Refund Request” and “Buy Now”.
63 short forms
63 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 4 trust badges and “250+ Brands”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Snap Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
42 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 42 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at zop.in, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on zop.in, including 17 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.