Website review, no card needed
forstinger.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202649 issues · 103 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on forstinger.com, 26 of them high impact, across 103 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65D- #79,239 of 85,515 reviewed websitesbeats 6%
- #41,987 of 43,571 online storesbeats 3%
- #67 of 70 Shopware storesbeats 3%
Closest competitors among Shopware stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 138 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 138 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 138 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 139 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 183 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.2 s
1.8 s
2.4 s
3.0 s
3.6 s
4.2 s
4.8 s
forstinger.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Improve image delivery
6.5 s · 1.7 MB17 images could be 1.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.5 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
5.8 s · 2.5 MB104 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.5 MB).
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.
10,229 HTML elements
The page has 10,229 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Mobile performance score: 18
18/100Your mobile performance score is 18 (desktop: 27). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.5 s
A phone's processor spends 4.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.1 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused JavaScript
600 ms · 233 KiBAbout 233 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 112 KiBAbout 112 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Doofinder, meinereifen.at and cookiefirst.com and others), adding 412 KiB and 76 ms of main-thread time.
Legacy JavaScript
21 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 330 ms
330 msYour server sent the HTML in 330 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user INP: 964 ms
964 msReal visitors wait 964 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 28.2 s
28.2 sYour largest element takes 28.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 32.1 s
32.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 32.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.4 s
9.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s
1.4 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.386
0.386The layout shifts by 0.386 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s
3.0 sThe first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 31% slower for real visitors
+31%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 138 ms to 183 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
12 images without width and height
12 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.09
0.09For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 511 ms
511 msReal visitors wait 511 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.5 MB in 145 requests
8.5 MBYour homepage downloads 8.5 MB in 145 requests on a phone: images 7.3 MB (72), scripts 495 KiB (47) and fonts 420 KiB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 3.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images far larger than shown
1.7 MB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Slide_Econelo (2).png at 2,521 px wide, shown at 350 px. Resized copies would save about 1.7 MB.
13 images in older formats
13 images (4.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
15 images below the first screen load straight away
15 images further down the page (2.9 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
AKTION_KW42-14-gelb-korrigiert_800x717.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 2.4 g of CO₂ per visit
2.40 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.40 g of CO₂e: 287.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
ARIA commands must have an accessible name (6 elements)
ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
7 images without alt text
7 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
21 links without text
21 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
8 form fields without a label
8 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (3 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).
1 checks passed
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (18 characters)
Your title is only 18 characters: “FORSTINGER Webshop”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Schutz für dein Fahrzeug.” and “Perfektion, die man sieht.”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
388 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 388 pages on forstinger.com and 0 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 156 characters
Your meta description is 156 characters: “Produkte und Dienstleistungen rund um Auto, Motorrad & Fahrrad bei FORSTINGER : Zubehör, Ersatzteile, Pflege & Werkstat…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.forstinger.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://forstinger.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,657 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
/wishlist is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
/wishlist has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /StoreLocator, whose canonical is /Filialfinder. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
13 pages without an H1
/wishlist, /Produkte, /Produkte/Autozubehoer, /Produkte/Reifen-Radzierblenden-Schneeketten, /Produkte/Chemie-Pflege and /Produkte/OEle-Additive and 7 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 193 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/label/Label_408946.svg.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught Error: Minified React error #299; visit https://reactjs.org/docs/error-decoder.html?invariant=299 for the full…”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
18 of 19 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
8 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (forstinger.com).
Valid certificate (64 days left)
The certificate from DigiCert Inc · RapidSSL TLS RSA CA G1 verifies for forstinger.com and is valid for another 64 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://forstinger.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 40 links work
All 40 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 0 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
forstinger.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
forstinger.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 27 years old
27 yearsforstinger.com was registered in Feb 1999 through Ascio Technologies, Inc. Danmark - Filial af Ascio technologies, Inc. USA. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Feb 2027
forstinger.com is registered until Feb 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,152 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,152 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be forstinger.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 a:k11210.coveto.de a mx a:mail.forstinger.com ip4:195.2.200.0/24 ip4:80.123.225.198 ip4:18.197.241.157 ip4:185.2…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 49 issues on forstinger.com, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.