Website review, no card needed

maasdam.nl logo

maasdam.nl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202628 issues · 75 checks

This review found 28 issues worth fixing on maasdam.nl, 13 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 17.2 MB in 94 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of maasdam.nl (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. maasdam.nl at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. maasdam.nl at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. maasdam.nl at 2.9 s2.9 s
  4. maasdam.nl at 3.8 s3.8 s
  5. maasdam.nl at 4.7 s4.7 s
  6. maasdam.nl at 5.7 s5.7 s
  7. maasdam.nl at 6.6 s6.6 s
  8. maasdam.nl at 7.6 s7.6 s

Speed

8 to fix53
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.5 s

    13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    750 ms · 661 KiB

    11 images could be 661 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Facebook and others), adding 1.1 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 63). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 575 ms

    575 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 575 ms of main-thread work and 672 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 439 KiB

    About 439 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    300 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 245 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    221 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (221 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 57 KiB

    About 57 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    20 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 20 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 168 ms

    168 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 168 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix55
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.3 s

    8.3 s

    Your largest element takes 8.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Een ervaring die klopt van begin tot eind”.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.9 s

    15.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.7 s

    6.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 437 ms

    437 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 437 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

1 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.028

    0.028

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.028, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 17.2 MB in 94 requests

    17.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 17.2 MB in 94 requests on a phone: media 14.3 MB (11), scripts 1.3 MB (29) and images 1.2 MB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (40 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (66 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.86 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.86 g of CO₂e: 583.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8288
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 11 tap targets too small

    11 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (2 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (22 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 42 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • 132 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 132 pages on maasdam.nl and 5 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 130 characters

    Your meta description is 130 characters: “Familiebedrijf sinds 1985. Maasdam verzorgt totaalinrichting, vloerafwerkingen en computervloeren voor kantoren en util…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Een ervaring die klopt van begin tot eind”.

  • Title: 63 characters

    Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “Totaalinrichting, vloerafwerkingen en computervloeren | Maasdam”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://maasdam.nl/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://maasdam.nl/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://maasdam.nl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (782 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://maasdam.nl/referentie and https://maasdam.nl/een-andere-kijk have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://maasdam.nl/computervloeren/traditionele-computervloer, https://maasdam.nl/computervloeren/gesloten-computervloer, https://maasdam.nl/computervloeren/downloads-computervloeren, https://maasdam.nl/referentie and https://maasdam.nl/een-andere-kijk have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 46 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to execute 'observe' on 'MutationObserver': parameter 1 is not of type 'Node'.”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    9 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 28 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 503 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 503 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Hotjar.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at maasdam.nl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Hotjar

Company

Founded
1985
Headquarters
Waddinxveen

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 28 issues on maasdam.nl, including 13 speed issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25