Website review, no card needed

marich.com logo

marich.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202631 issues · 75 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on marich.com, 14 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.0 s1.5 sMay 2Oct 173.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.0 s
May 9, 20262.2 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.1 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.3 s
Aug 22, 20263.4 s
Aug 29, 20263.6 s
Sep 5, 20263.1 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.6 s
Sep 26, 20263.9 s
Oct 3, 20264.4 s
Oct 10, 20264.6 s
Oct 17, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
75 ms62 msMay 2Oct 1770 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202663 ms
May 9, 202663 ms
May 16, 202666 ms
May 23, 202663 ms
May 30, 202665 ms
Jun 6, 202666 ms
Jun 13, 202668 ms
Jun 20, 202669 ms
Jun 27, 202671 ms
Jul 4, 202670 ms
Jul 11, 202673 ms
Jul 18, 202673 ms
Jul 25, 202670 ms
Aug 1, 202672 ms
Aug 8, 202670 ms
Aug 15, 202670 ms
Aug 22, 202670 ms
Aug 29, 202668 ms
Sep 5, 202665 ms
Sep 12, 202663 ms
Sep 19, 202664 ms
Sep 26, 202667 ms
Oct 3, 202670 ms
Oct 10, 202673 ms
Oct 17, 202670 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of marich.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. marich.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. marich.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. marich.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. marich.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. marich.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. marich.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  7. marich.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  8. marich.com at 3.2 s3.2 s

Speed

4 to fix63
  • Improve image delivery

    3.8 s · 741 KiB

    2 images could be 741 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    4.0 s

    55 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.0 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 63

    63/100

    Your mobile performance score is 63 (desktop: 88). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 87 KiB

    About 87 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 101 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    28 KiB

    About 28 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 88 but mobile only 63. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Google Fonts), adding 59 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 332 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.5 s

    10.5 s

    Your largest element takes 10.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Indulge in the perfect harmony of soft, sweet blueberries e…”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.5 s

    10.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 87% slower for real visitors

    +87%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 6 images without width and height

    6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 63 ms to 70 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 70 ms

    70 ms

    Real visitors wait 70 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix55
  • 1 image over 500 KB

    Marich-Logo-2023-2435x1080-px.png weighs 730 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    729 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Marich-Logo-2023-2435x1080-px.png at 10,147 px wide, shown at 113 px. Resized copies would save about 729 KiB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (760 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (109 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.51 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.51 g of CO₂e: 61.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.8 MB in 77 requests

    1.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.8 MB in 77 requests on a phone: images 1.3 MB (10), scripts 197 KiB (38) and stylesheets 133 KiB (23). That is a lean page.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8891
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 22 text elements with low contrast

    22 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4 and h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 28 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9290
  • 8 H1 headlines

    There are 8 <h1> headlines (“NEW POUCH”, “Dark Chocolate” and “Blueberries!”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 37 internal links, 19 external

    The homepage links to 37 pages on marich.com and 19 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 128 characters

    Your meta description is 128 characters: “Marich Pancrafted Chocolates are a line of delicious snackable, shareable and giftable chocolates made from premium ing…”.

  • Title: 45 characters

    Your title is a healthy 45 characters: “MARICH® Confectionery - Pancrafted Chocolates”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://marich.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://marich.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://marich.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (680 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix0
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to https://marich.com/shop/package-type/gifts-packaging-type, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    15 of 18 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix60
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 394 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 394 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Learn More About Our Ingredients” and “Sign Up”.

  • 5 short forms

    5 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Meta Pixel, Hotjar and HubSpot.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at marich.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on marich.com, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25