Website review, no card needed

medeco.com logo

medeco.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202646 issues · 76 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on medeco.com, 21 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.1 s2.6 sMay 2Oct 173.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.9 s
May 9, 20262.9 s
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.9 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.9 s
Aug 15, 20262.9 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.9 s
Sep 5, 20262.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.9 s
Sep 19, 20262.9 s
Sep 26, 20262.9 s
Oct 3, 20262.9 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
149 ms122 msMay 2Oct 17125 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026141 ms
May 9, 2026143 ms
May 16, 2026145 ms
May 23, 2026146 ms
May 30, 2026142 ms
Jun 6, 2026141 ms
Jun 13, 2026137 ms
Jun 20, 2026137 ms
Jun 27, 2026137 ms
Jul 4, 2026134 ms
Jul 11, 2026129 ms
Jul 18, 2026128 ms
Jul 25, 2026129 ms
Aug 1, 2026128 ms
Aug 8, 2026131 ms
Aug 15, 2026129 ms
Aug 22, 2026137 ms
Aug 29, 2026136 ms
Sep 5, 2026134 ms
Sep 12, 2026136 ms
Sep 19, 2026133 ms
Sep 26, 2026130 ms
Oct 3, 2026129 ms
Oct 10, 2026127 ms
Oct 17, 2026125 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of medeco.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. medeco.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. medeco.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. medeco.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. medeco.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. medeco.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  6. medeco.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  7. medeco.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  8. medeco.com at 3.6 s3.6 s

Speed

12 to fix15
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    10.4 s · 1.7 MB

    About 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.5 s · 1.2 MB

    144 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.2 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    18 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 15

    15/100

    Your mobile performance score is 15 (desktop: 15). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    750 ms · 607 KiB

    5 images could be 607 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, ujet.co and Optanon and others), adding 3.3 MB and 980 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 152 KiB

    About 152 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • ujet.co adds 341 ms

    341 ms

    ujet.co costs a phone 341 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 410 ms

    410 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 410 ms of main-thread work and 504 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 396 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Vimeo adds 83 ms

    83 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 83 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 48 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 48 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 6 ms

    6 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 2.18

    2.18

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 2.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 26.9 s

    26.9 s

    Your largest element takes 26.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.5 s

    31.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.9 s

    12.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.64

    0.64

    The layout shifts by 0.64 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 735 ms

    735 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 735 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 130 ms

    130 ms

    Real visitors wait 130 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 560 ms

    560 ms

    Real visitors wait 560 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% faster for real visitors

    -11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 141 ms to 125 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

3 to fix50
  • Page weight: 5.3 MB in 184 requests

    5.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.3 MB in 184 requests on a phone: scripts 4.1 MB (127), images 886 KiB (15) and stylesheets 171 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (568 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    27 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example cq5dam.web.1280.1280.jpeg at 1,196 px wide, shown at 374 px. Resized copies would save about 27 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (153 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.49 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.49 g of CO₂e: 179.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9594
  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA progressbar nodes must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA progressbar nodes must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (22 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 9268
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (117 characters)

    Your title is 117 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Medeco | High Security Door Locks and Patent Protected Keys to Keep Valuables Safe and Se…”.

  • Meta description is long (184 characters)

    Your meta description is 184 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 2 problems

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList and WebSite) but with 2 problems, for example “ld+json block 1 is not valid JSON (Expected double-quoted property name in JSON at position 339)”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • 6 links with vague text

    6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.medeco.com/en.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.medeco.com/en/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    0%

    A phone browser shows 837 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.medeco.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 5888
  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CERT_VERIFIER_CHANGED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    25 of 28 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix30
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 837 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 837 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at medeco.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on medeco.com, including 23 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25