Website review, no card needed

middo.de logo

middo.de website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202631 issues · 80 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on middo.de, 11 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s739 msMay 23Nov 72.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.0 s
May 30, 20261.0 s
Jun 6, 2026991 ms
Jun 13, 2026971 ms
Jun 20, 20261.0 s
Jun 27, 2026989 ms
Jul 4, 2026983 ms
Jul 11, 20261.0 s
Jul 18, 2026985 ms
Jul 25, 20261.0 s
Aug 1, 20261.1 s
Aug 8, 20261.2 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Oct 31, 20262.4 s
Nov 7, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
149 ms105 msMay 23Nov 7144 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026111 ms
May 30, 2026112 ms
Jun 6, 2026119 ms
Jun 13, 2026126 ms
Jun 20, 2026126 ms
Jun 27, 2026126 ms
Jul 4, 2026122 ms
Jul 11, 2026120 ms
Jul 18, 2026120 ms
Jul 25, 2026121 ms
Aug 1, 2026119 ms
Aug 8, 2026121 ms
Aug 15, 2026129 ms
Aug 22, 2026130 ms
Aug 29, 2026121 ms
Sep 5, 2026119 ms
Sep 12, 2026110 ms
Sep 19, 2026116 ms
Sep 26, 2026119 ms
Oct 3, 2026119 ms
Oct 10, 2026122 ms
Oct 17, 2026122 ms
Oct 24, 2026128 ms
Oct 31, 2026135 ms
Nov 7, 2026144 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of middo.de (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. middo.de at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. middo.de at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. middo.de at 2.9 s2.9 s
  4. middo.de at 3.8 s3.8 s
  5. middo.de at 4.8 s4.8 s
  6. middo.de at 5.8 s5.8 s
  7. middo.de at 6.7 s6.7 s
  8. middo.de at 7.7 s7.7 s

Speed

7 to fix75
  • 5,168 HTML elements

    The page has 5,168 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 4.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 75

    75/100

    Your mobile performance score is 75. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    700 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 700 ms.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 522 KiB

    19 images could be 522 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 108 KiB

    About 108 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Klaviyo adds 172 ms

    172 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 172 ms of main-thread work and 312 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Klaviyo, Shopify and Trust Pilot and others), adding 706 KiB and 373 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 14 KiB

    About 14 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 99 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    35 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (35 KiB).

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    33 KiB

    33 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    30 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 16 ms

    16 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 16 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Speed Index: 9.0 s

    9.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.7 s

    10.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    Your largest element takes 4.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “5 Jahre Middo: Early Black Friday mit bis zu 70 % Rabatt au…”.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 25% slower for real visitors

    +25%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 111 ms to 144 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 145% slower for real visitors

    +145%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 144 ms

    144 ms

    Real visitors wait 144 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 625 ms

    625 ms

    Real visitors wait 625 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 72 ms

    72 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 72 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.3 MB in 341 requests

    3.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.3 MB in 341 requests on a phone: images 1.2 MB (41), other files 1.1 MB (180) and scripts 751 KiB (89). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.92 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.92 g of CO₂e: 110.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9195
  • 15 tap targets too small

    15 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 11 text elements with low contrast

    11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 22 links without text

    22 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 867 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 56 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 56 passed and 4 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9295
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 880 internal links, 17 external

    The homepage links to 880 pages on middo.de and 17 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 121 characters

    Your meta description is 121 characters: “Entdecken Sie exklusive Produkte, die Komfort, Stil & Freude vereinen. Nur online bei Middo erhältlich – jetzt entdecke…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “5 Jahre Middo. Feier mit!”.

  • Title: 58 characters

    Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Middo | Komfort & Innovation – Smarte Produkte für Zuhause”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://middo.de/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://middo.de/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,465 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://middo.de/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix68
  • 1 page without a title

    https://middo.de/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://middo.de/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://middo.de/customer_authentication/redirect has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://middo.de/collections/halloween-angebote, https://middo.de/collections/herbst-winterangebote, https://middo.de/collections/bettbezuege-und-matratzenbezuege, https://middo.de/collections/damen-jacken-und-westen, https://middo.de/collections/herren-jacken-und-westen and https://middo.de/collections/decken-und-plaids and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 12 pages with very little text

    https://middo.de/collections/herbst-winterangebote, https://middo.de/collections/bettbezuege-und-matratzenbezuege, https://middo.de/collections/damen-jacken-und-westen, https://middo.de/collections/herren-jacken-und-westen, https://middo.de/collections/decken-und-plaids and https://middo.de/collections/hausschuhe-und-socken and 6 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 197 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

Best practices

Google 96100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    71 of 82 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,347 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,347 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 22 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and 2 trust badges.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 26 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 26 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at middo.de, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 6 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Fixel Pixel 2 · Kaching Bundles · Aftersell · Revoq Eu Withdrawal Button · Gdpr Production

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Bootstrap
E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on middo.de, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25