Website review, no card needed

multi.eu logo

multi.eu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202630 issues · 76 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on multi.eu, 16 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s1.9 sMay 2Oct 172.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.7 s
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20263.2 s
Aug 1, 20263.2 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.1 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
131 ms86 msMay 2Oct 17111 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026120 ms
May 9, 2026117 ms
May 16, 2026111 ms
May 23, 2026116 ms
May 30, 2026115 ms
Jun 6, 2026121 ms
Jun 13, 2026126 ms
Jun 20, 2026122 ms
Jun 27, 2026121 ms
Jul 4, 2026121 ms
Jul 11, 2026122 ms
Jul 18, 2026122 ms
Jul 25, 2026114 ms
Aug 1, 2026108 ms
Aug 8, 202699 ms
Aug 15, 202696 ms
Aug 22, 202695 ms
Aug 29, 202694 ms
Sep 5, 202691 ms
Sep 12, 202694 ms
Sep 19, 202696 ms
Sep 26, 202696 ms
Oct 3, 202697 ms
Oct 10, 202698 ms
Oct 17, 2026111 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of multi.eu (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. multi.eu at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. multi.eu at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. multi.eu at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. multi.eu at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. multi.eu at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. multi.eu at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. multi.eu at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. multi.eu at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

6 to fix60
  • Improve image delivery

    10.4 s · 2.3 MB

    15 images could be 2.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    4.7 s

    13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.7 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 204 KiB

    About 204 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.0 s · 57 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (57 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60 (desktop: 76). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 63 KiB

    About 63 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, jQuery CDN and Yandex Metrica and others), adding 394 KiB and 313 ms of main-thread time.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 114 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 419 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 23.6 s

    23.6 s

    Your largest element takes 23.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.7 s

    23.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.1 s

    6.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

10 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 116 ms

    116 ms

    Real visitors wait 116 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 638 ms

    638 ms

    Real visitors wait 638 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 120 ms to 111 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 24% faster for real visitors

    -24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 76 ms

    76 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 76 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.03

    0.03

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.03, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 4.2 MB in 63 requests

    4.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.2 MB in 63 requests on a phone: images 2.7 MB (20), fonts 581 KiB (5) and scripts 527 KiB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    651 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example [email protected] at 1,140 px wide, shown at 368 px. Resized copies would save about 651 KiB.

  • 9 images in older formats

    9 images (1.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 10 images below the first screen load straight away

    10 images further down the page (1.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.18 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.18 g of CO₂e: 141.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8188
  • 6 buttons without a name

    6 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 26 text elements with low contrast

    26 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 24 tap targets too small

    24 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 52 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8578
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (24 characters)

    Your title is only 24 characters: “Home - Multi Corporation”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 87 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 87 pages on multi.eu and 6 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Driving Value”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://multi.eu/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://multi.eu/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (900 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://multi.eu/llms.txt (111 KiB, 521 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 32 small tap targets

    32 of 69 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

100
  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 666 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 666 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.

  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 31 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Yandex Metrica (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at multi.eu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on multi.eu, including 10 speed issues and 4 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25