Website review, no card needed
multi.eu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202630 issues · 76 checks
This review found 30 issues worth fixing on multi.eu, 16 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
85BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 120 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 117 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 116 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 111 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
10.4 s · 2.3 MB15 images could be 2.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
4.7 s13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.7 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 204 KiBAbout 204 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.0 s · 57 KiB5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (57 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 60
60/100Your mobile performance score is 60 (desktop: 76). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 63 KiBAbout 63 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, jQuery CDN and Yandex Metrica and others), adding 394 KiB and 313 ms of main-thread time.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 114 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.0 s
A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 419 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.6 s
23.6 sYour largest element takes 23.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 23.7 s
23.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.1 s
5.1 sThe first text or image appears after 5.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.1 s
6.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
10 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 116 ms
116 msReal visitors wait 116 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 638 ms
638 msReal visitors wait 638 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 120 ms to 111 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 24% faster for real visitors
-24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 76 ms
76 msScripts block the page for only 76 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.03
0.03The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.03, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.2 MB in 63 requests
4.2 MBYour homepage downloads 4.2 MB in 63 requests on a phone: images 2.7 MB (20), fonts 581 KiB (5) and scripts 527 KiB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images far larger than shown
651 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example [email protected] at 1,140 px wide, shown at 368 px. Resized copies would save about 651 KiB.
9 images in older formats
9 images (1.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
10 images below the first screen load straight away
10 images further down the page (1.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.18 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.18 g of CO₂e: 141.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
6 buttons without a name
6 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
26 text elements with low contrast
26 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
24 tap targets too small
24 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 52 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (24 characters)
Your title is only 24 characters: “Home - Multi Corporation”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
87 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 87 pages on multi.eu and 6 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Driving Value”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://multi.eu/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://multi.eu/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (900 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://multi.eu/llms.txt (111 KiB, 521 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
1 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Best practices
32 small tap targets
32 of 69 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 666 words of copy
The homepage carries about 666 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 31 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Yandex Metrica (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at multi.eu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 30 issues on multi.eu, including 10 speed issues and 4 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.