Website review, no card needed

multisom.com.br logo

multisom.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202639 issues · 82 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on multisom.com.br, 19 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.3 s3.4 sMay 9Oct 243.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20264.2 s
May 16, 20264.1 s
May 23, 20264.0 s
May 30, 20264.0 s
Jun 6, 20264.0 s
Jun 13, 20264.1 s
Jun 20, 20264.1 s
Jun 27, 20264.1 s
Jul 4, 20264.1 s
Jul 11, 20264.2 s
Jul 18, 20264.1 s
Jul 25, 20264.1 s
Aug 1, 20264.1 s
Aug 8, 20264.0 s
Aug 15, 20264.0 s
Aug 22, 20264.0 s
Aug 29, 20264.0 s
Sep 5, 20263.8 s
Sep 12, 20263.6 s
Sep 19, 20263.6 s
Sep 26, 20263.5 s
Oct 3, 20263.5 s
Oct 10, 20263.8 s
Oct 17, 20263.9 s
Oct 24, 20263.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
194 ms142 msMay 9Oct 24184 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026187 ms
May 16, 2026188 ms
May 23, 2026188 ms
May 30, 2026181 ms
Jun 6, 2026176 ms
Jun 13, 2026174 ms
Jun 20, 2026172 ms
Jun 27, 2026169 ms
Jul 4, 2026166 ms
Jul 11, 2026161 ms
Jul 18, 2026163 ms
Jul 25, 2026170 ms
Aug 1, 2026172 ms
Aug 8, 2026173 ms
Aug 15, 2026177 ms
Aug 22, 2026168 ms
Aug 29, 2026168 ms
Sep 5, 2026168 ms
Sep 12, 2026163 ms
Sep 19, 2026156 ms
Sep 26, 2026148 ms
Oct 3, 2026151 ms
Oct 10, 2026164 ms
Oct 17, 2026182 ms
Oct 24, 2026184 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of multisom.com.br (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. multisom.com.br at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. multisom.com.br at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. multisom.com.br at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. multisom.com.br at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. multisom.com.br at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. multisom.com.br at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. multisom.com.br at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. multisom.com.br at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

12 to fix17
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.6 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.6 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 792 KiB

    About 792 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 285 KiB

    About 285 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 17

    17/100

    Your mobile performance score is 17 (desktop: 35). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 4,115 HTML elements

    The page has 4,115 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, usebeon.io and cloudfront.net and others), adding 2.8 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    750 ms · 876 KiB

    32 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (876 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 616 ms

    616 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 616 ms of main-thread work and 833 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 358 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • cloudfront.net adds 175 ms

    175 ms

    cloudfront.net costs a phone 175 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • usebeon.io adds 186 ms

    186 ms

    usebeon.io costs a phone 186 ms of main-thread work and 400 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 46 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 46 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    12 KiB

    1 image could be 12 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Minify JavaScript

    8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 32 ms

    32 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 32 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.68

    0.68

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.68 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.5 s

    11.5 s

    Your largest element takes 11.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Banner Multisom”.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.4 s

    21.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.774

    0.774

    The layout shifts by 0.774 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 878 ms

    878 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 878 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 6.0 s

    6.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Real visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 187 ms to 184 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.2 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 182 ms

    182 ms

    Real visitors wait 182 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix67
  • Page weight: 3.2 MB in 71 requests

    3.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.2 MB in 71 requests on a phone: scripts 2.0 MB (27), images 863 KiB (11) and stylesheets 202 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.89 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.89 g of CO₂e: 107.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 7689
  • Links must have discernible text (1 element)

    Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 21 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 26 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 31 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 26 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10089
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 874 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 874 pages on multisom.com.br and 2 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 130 characters

    Your meta description is 130 characters: “As melhores marcas e ofertas em Instrumentos Musicais, Smart TVs, Celulares, Notebooks e Áudio você encontra na Multiso…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Multisom”.

  • Title: 62 characters

    Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “Multisom: Loja de Instrumentos Musicais, Celulares e Smart TVs”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.multisom.com.br/sitemap/index.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.multisom.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

100
  • 5 pages slow to respond

    https://www.multisom.com.br/audio-ms/audio-profissional-ms/equalizador-ms, https://www.multisom.com.br/audio-ms/audio-profissional-ms/fone-profissional-ms, https://www.multisom.com.br/audio-ms/audio-profissional-ms/pre-amplificador-ms, https://www.multisom.com.br/audio-ms/audio-profissional-ms/processador-de-audio-ms and https://www.multisom.com.br/audio-ms/audio-profissional-ms/regua-ms took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 199 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    10 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 10 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 7396
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,537 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,537 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at multisom.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on multisom.com.br, including 24 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25