Website review, no card needed

naylor.com logo

naylor.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202629 issues · 83 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on naylor.com, 8 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s1.9 sMay 16Oct 312.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20263.1 s
Jul 4, 20263.2 s
Jul 11, 20263.2 s
Jul 18, 20263.2 s
Jul 25, 20263.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.2 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.7 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Oct 31, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
88 ms71 msMay 16Oct 3185 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202677 ms
May 23, 202673 ms
May 30, 202674 ms
Jun 6, 202679 ms
Jun 13, 202681 ms
Jun 20, 202685 ms
Jun 27, 202679 ms
Jul 4, 202679 ms
Jul 11, 202679 ms
Jul 18, 202679 ms
Jul 25, 202682 ms
Aug 1, 202685 ms
Aug 8, 202679 ms
Aug 15, 202679 ms
Aug 22, 202679 ms
Aug 29, 202679 ms
Sep 5, 202683 ms
Sep 12, 202684 ms
Sep 19, 202681 ms
Sep 26, 202682 ms
Oct 3, 202682 ms
Oct 10, 202677 ms
Oct 17, 202685 ms
Oct 24, 202686 ms
Oct 31, 202685 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of naylor.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. naylor.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. naylor.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. naylor.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. naylor.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. naylor.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. naylor.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. naylor.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. naylor.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

7 to fix79
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.3 s

    34 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    350 ms · 1.5 MB

    15 images could be 1.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 79

    79/100

    Your mobile performance score is 79. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 140 KiB

    About 140 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 325 KiB

    About 325 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Cookiebot adds 256 ms

    256 ms

    Cookiebot costs a phone 256 ms of main-thread work and 204 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,563 HTML elements

    The page has 2,563 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Cookiebot and Google Tag Manager), adding 329 KiB and 333 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 34 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (34 KiB).

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 79 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 610 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.1 s

    17.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Your largest element takes 4.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 16 images without width and height

    16 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 77 ms to 85 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 85 ms

    85 ms

    Real visitors wait 85 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 24% faster for real visitors

    -24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.014

    0.014

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.014, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 60 ms

    60 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 60 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix45
  • Page weight: 4.5 MB in 147 requests

    4.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 147 requests on a phone: images 2.8 MB (45), scripts 1.1 MB (58) and fonts 303 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (632 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.27 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.27 g of CO₂e: 152.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8995
  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 12 images without alt text

    12 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts

    Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts (6 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 7789
  • Title is long (76 characters)

    Your title is 76 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Home - Naylor Association Solutions | Increase Engagement & Non-Dues Revenue”.

  • 24 links crawlers can't follow

    24 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 20 links with vague text

    20 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 125 internal links, 41 external

    The homepage links to 125 pages on naylor.com and 41 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 128 characters

    Your meta description is 128 characters: “Maximize your association's growth and non-dues revenue with Naylor's solutions in communications, events, and member e…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Empowering Associations to Achieve Success”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.naylor.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.naylor.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.naylor.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,692 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.naylor.com/member-communications-and-content, https://www.naylor.com/marketing-services-for-association and https://www.naylor.com/editorial-and-content have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 14 pages without an H1

    https://www.naylor.com/association-solutions, https://www.naylor.com/revenue-generation, https://www.naylor.com/association-strategy, https://www.naylor.com/member-engagement, https://www.naylor.com/software and https://www.naylor.com/member-communications-and-content and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 76 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 11 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 low-resolution images

    2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • About 358 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 358 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Request a Meeting”.

  • 34 calls to action

    The homepage has 34 calls to action, for example “Start Up Services”, “Request a Meeting” and “Learn More”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 4 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at naylor.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on naylor.com, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25