piercingxxl.pl website review

Your mobile performance score is 74. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (247 KiB).

About 264 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.

19 images could be 410 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 991 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

The page has 2,285 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

8 third-party services load with your homepage (Key CDN, Usercentrics CMP and Trusted Shops and others), adding 588 KiB and 232 ms of main-thread time.

About 114 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 100 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

Polyfills for old browsers add 15 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

Your largest element takes 5.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Sztanga kwiatek cyrkonia”.

The page becomes fully interactive after 8.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

Real visitors wait 808 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Visually, the page fills in at 4.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

The layout shifts by 0.105 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Your homepage downloads 3.1 MB in 252 requests on a phone: images 1.2 MB (43), other files 890 KiB (143) and scripts 857 KiB (51). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.89 g of CO₂e: 106.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

39 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

Your meta description is 212 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

The homepage links to 412 pages on piercingxxl.pl and 1 external page.

There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 123 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“CSS appearance value `slider-vertical` is not standardized and will be removed.”).

1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID”.

Large scripts ship without source maps.

On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

The homepage carries about 1,335 words of visible text.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.