Website review, no card needed

pintek.id logo

pintek.id website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202647 issues · 74 checks

This review found 47 issues worth fixing on pintek.id, 18 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s3.0 sApr 25Oct 103.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20263.3 s
May 2, 20263.2 s
May 9, 20263.2 s
May 16, 20263.2 s
May 23, 20263.1 s
May 30, 20263.2 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.1 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.1 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.2 s
Aug 1, 20263.2 s
Aug 8, 20263.2 s
Aug 15, 20263.4 s
Aug 22, 20263.4 s
Aug 29, 20263.4 s
Sep 5, 20263.4 s
Sep 12, 20263.4 s
Sep 19, 20263.4 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.4 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
296 ms241 msApr 25Oct 10280 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026259 ms
May 2, 2026260 ms
May 9, 2026263 ms
May 16, 2026268 ms
May 23, 2026269 ms
May 30, 2026274 ms
Jun 6, 2026277 ms
Jun 13, 2026276 ms
Jun 20, 2026276 ms
Jun 27, 2026266 ms
Jul 4, 2026257 ms
Jul 11, 2026247 ms
Jul 18, 2026248 ms
Jul 25, 2026256 ms
Aug 1, 2026263 ms
Aug 8, 2026267 ms
Aug 15, 2026269 ms
Aug 22, 2026253 ms
Aug 29, 2026251 ms
Sep 5, 2026252 ms
Sep 12, 2026257 ms
Sep 19, 2026269 ms
Sep 26, 2026280 ms
Oct 3, 2026290 ms
Oct 10, 2026280 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of pintek.id (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. pintek.id at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. pintek.id at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. pintek.id at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. pintek.id at 2.1 s2.1 s
  5. pintek.id at 2.6 s2.6 s
  6. pintek.id at 3.1 s3.1 s
  7. pintek.id at 3.7 s3.7 s
  8. pintek.id at 4.2 s4.2 s

Speed

9 to fix53
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.8 s · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.3 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.3 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.5 s · 373 KiB

    21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (373 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    800 ms · 615 KiB

    3 images could be 615 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 38). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hubspot and Google Analytics and others), adding 1.4 MB and 651 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    670 ms · 92 KiB

    About 92 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 670 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 494 ms

    494 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 494 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 920 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 175 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 24.7 s

    24.7 s

    Your largest element takes 24.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Berizin dan diawasi oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Layanan Pen…”.

  • Speed Index: 17.6 s

    17.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 17.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 24.9 s

    24.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Real visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 276 ms

    276 ms

    Real visitors wait 276 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • 23 images without width and height

    23 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 247 ms

    247 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 247 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 259 ms to 280 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.09

    0.09

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 515 ms

    515 ms

    Real visitors wait 515 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.067

    0.067

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.067, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix45
  • Page weight: 20.5 MB in 121 requests

    20.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 20.5 MB in 121 requests on a phone: images 17.7 MB (32), scripts 2.1 MB (41) and other files 619 KiB (40). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    newest-pop-up.webp weighs 508 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    326 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example newest-pop-up.webp at 1,195 px wide, shown at 350 px. Resized copies would save about 326 KiB.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (253 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (100 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 5.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.82 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.82 g of CO₂e: 698.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8486
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (2 elements)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (2 elements)

    Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

1 checks passed
  • 32 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 39 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 32 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

9 to fixGoogle 8267
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://pintek.id/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at pintek.id/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

2 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Please Wait ...”.

  • Title: 49 characters

    Your title is a healthy 49 characters: “Pintek: Supply Chain Financing dan Sektor Lainnya”.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    0%

    A phone browser shows 606 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 2. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://pintek.id/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9692
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix20
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 606 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 606 words of visible text.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 17 cookies set on arrival

    17

    Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pintek.id, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2023.

Stack

Framework
Next.js

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 47 issues on pintek.id, including 18 speed issues, 9 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25