Website review, no card needed

pinto.srl logo

pinto.srl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202637 issues · 84 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on pinto.srl, 14 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.3 s2.0 sApr 25Oct 102.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20262.1 s
May 2, 20262.0 s
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.2 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
143 ms101 msApr 25Oct 10138 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026117 ms
May 2, 2026116 ms
May 9, 2026111 ms
May 16, 2026115 ms
May 23, 2026120 ms
May 30, 2026121 ms
Jun 6, 2026124 ms
Jun 13, 2026127 ms
Jun 20, 2026122 ms
Jun 27, 2026122 ms
Jul 4, 2026122 ms
Jul 11, 2026111 ms
Jul 18, 2026112 ms
Jul 25, 2026112 ms
Aug 1, 2026106 ms
Aug 8, 2026114 ms
Aug 15, 2026111 ms
Aug 22, 2026110 ms
Aug 29, 2026132 ms
Sep 5, 2026132 ms
Sep 12, 2026132 ms
Sep 19, 2026138 ms
Sep 26, 2026127 ms
Oct 3, 2026133 ms
Oct 10, 2026138 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of pinto.srl (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. pinto.srl at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. pinto.srl at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. pinto.srl at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. pinto.srl at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. pinto.srl at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. pinto.srl at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. pinto.srl at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. pinto.srl at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix49
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.0 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.0 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 49

    49/100

    Your mobile performance score is 49 (desktop: 39). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    9.9 MB

    10 images could be 9.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    900 ms · 650 KiB

    About 650 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Cookiebot and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Font display

    650 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 650 ms).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 512 ms

    512 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 512 ms of main-thread work and 516 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 344 ms

    344 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 344 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 91 KiB

    About 91 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 196 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 34 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (34 KiB).

  • Minify JavaScript

    71 KiB

    71 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 49.4 s

    49.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 49.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    Your largest element takes 7.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Utilizziamo i cookie per personalizzare contenuti ed annunc…”.

  • Speed Index: 9.5 s

    9.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 465 ms

    465 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 465 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 21 images without width and height

    21 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors

    +16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 117 ms to 138 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 145 ms

    145 ms

    Real visitors wait 145 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 733 ms

    733 ms

    Real visitors wait 733 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 14.4 MB in 100 requests

    14.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 14.4 MB in 100 requests on a phone: images 12.1 MB (36), scripts 1.7 MB (36) and other files 354 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images over 500 KB

    4 images weigh 3.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    2.9 MB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example PINTO-GREEN.jpg at 2,362 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 2.9 MB.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (3.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (3.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.09 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.09 g of CO₂e: 491.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9092
  • 13 text elements with low contrast

    13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 30 images without alt text

    30 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (22 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

1 checks passed
  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 5 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9296
  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.pinto.srl/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 36 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 36 pages on pinto.srl and 16 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 143 characters

    Your meta description is 143 characters: “Qualità e innovazione sono i principi che ci hanno permesso di diventare una realtà di riferimento nella produzione di …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Chi siamo”.

  • Title: 59 characters

    Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Pinto Srl - Tapparelle, Frangisole e Serrande Made in Italy”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.pinto.srl/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.pinto.srl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (451 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 3 pages share a title

    /, https://www.pinto.srl/de and https://www.pinto.srl/en all use the title “Pinto Srl - Tapparelle, Frangisole e Serrande Made in Italy”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.pinto.srl/de and https://www.pinto.srl/en use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.pinto.srl/configuratore has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    7 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 7 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 7 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 8891
  • 14 small tap targets

    14 of 33 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • 3 low-resolution images

    3 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix40
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 523 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 523 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pinto.srl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on pinto.srl, including 16 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25