Website review, no card needed

pinterest.com logo

pinterest.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202637 issues · 61 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on pinterest.com, 18 of them high impact, across 61 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.4 s4.1 sApr 18Oct 34.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20264.2 s
Apr 25, 20264.2 s
May 2, 20264.1 s
May 9, 20264.1 s
May 16, 20264.1 s
May 23, 20264.1 s
May 30, 20264.2 s
Jun 6, 20264.2 s
Jun 13, 20264.2 s
Jun 20, 20264.3 s
Jun 27, 20264.3 s
Jul 4, 20264.3 s
Jul 11, 20264.3 s
Jul 18, 20264.3 s
Jul 25, 20264.3 s
Aug 1, 20264.3 s
Aug 8, 20264.3 s
Aug 15, 20264.3 s
Aug 22, 20264.2 s
Aug 29, 20264.3 s
Sep 5, 20264.3 s
Sep 12, 20264.3 s
Sep 19, 20264.3 s
Sep 26, 20264.3 s
Oct 3, 20264.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
746 ms426 msApr 18Oct 3463 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026610 ms
Apr 25, 2026615 ms
May 2, 2026617 ms
May 9, 2026620 ms
May 16, 2026618 ms
May 23, 2026621 ms
May 30, 2026623 ms
Jun 6, 2026622 ms
Jun 13, 2026626 ms
Jun 20, 2026633 ms
Jun 27, 2026640 ms
Jul 4, 2026663 ms
Jul 11, 2026692 ms
Jul 18, 2026708 ms
Jul 25, 2026709 ms
Aug 1, 2026688 ms
Aug 8, 2026651 ms
Aug 15, 2026606 ms
Aug 22, 2026562 ms
Aug 29, 2026523 ms
Sep 5, 2026493 ms
Sep 12, 2026476 ms
Sep 19, 2026474 ms
Sep 26, 2026470 ms
Oct 3, 2026463 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of pinterest.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. pinterest.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. pinterest.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. pinterest.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. pinterest.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  5. pinterest.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  6. pinterest.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  7. pinterest.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  8. pinterest.com at 4.8 s4.8 s

Speed

8 to fix45
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.9 s · 1.4 MB

    About 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 45

    45/100

    Your mobile performance score is 45 (desktop: 57). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.3 MB

    29 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Other Google APIs/SDKs and Google reCAPTCHA and others), adding 1.7 MB and 546 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google CDN adds 300 ms

    300 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 300 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 211 ms

    211 ms

    Other Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 211 ms of main-thread work and 554 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Fonts adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Google Fonts costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 472 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 198 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    65 KiB

    About 65 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 84 ms

    84 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 84 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Real visitors wait 5.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 695 ms

    695 ms

    Real visitors wait 695 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 11.0 s

    11.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 11.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.2 s

    12.2 s

    Your largest element takes 12.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.1 s

    31.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 13.3 s

    13.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.12

    0.12

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.12 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 407 ms

    407 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 407 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.2 s to 4.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Tap response (INP) got 24% faster for real visitors

    -24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 610 ms to 463 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.008

    0.008

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.008, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 6.1 MB in 167 requests

    6.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.1 MB in 167 requests on a phone: scripts 2.8 MB (77), images 1.7 MB (41) and HTML 600 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.72 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.72 g of CO₂e: 206.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9693
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

1 checks passed
  • 13 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 14 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 13 passed and 1 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10069
  • robots.txt blocks all crawlers

    Your robots.txt disallows the whole site for every crawler, so search engines are told to stay out.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (9 characters)

    Your title is only 9 characters: “Pinterest”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.pinterest.com/v3_sitemaps/seasonal_events_sitemap_20261123_labor_thanksgiving_day_www.pinterest.com.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 71 characters

    Your meta description is 71 characters: “Discover recipes, home ideas, style inspiration and other ideas to try.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.pinterest.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

AI search readiness

2 to fix37
  • robots.txt blocks 6 AI answer engine crawlers

    6 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.pinterest.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9292
  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Error handled by React Router default ErrorBoundary: TypeError: Cannot use 'in' operator to search for 'addEventListene…”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix25
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 61 words

    The homepage has only about 61 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Pinterest Tag (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pinterest.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on pinterest.com, including 19 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25