Website review, no card needed
pinterest.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202637 issues · 61 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on pinterest.com, 18 of them high impact, across 61 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
59FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 610 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 615 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 617 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 620 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 618 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 621 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 623 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 622 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 626 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 633 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 640 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 663 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 692 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 708 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 709 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 688 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 651 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 606 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 562 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 523 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 493 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 476 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 474 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 470 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 463 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.2 s
1.8 s
2.4 s
3.0 s
3.6 s
4.2 s
4.8 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.9 s · 1.4 MBAbout 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.9 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 45
45/100Your mobile performance score is 45 (desktop: 57). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.1 s
A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Improve image delivery
1.3 MB29 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Other Google APIs/SDKs and Google reCAPTCHA and others), adding 1.7 MB and 546 ms of main-thread time.
Google CDN adds 300 ms
300 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 300 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 211 ms
211 msOther Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 211 ms of main-thread work and 554 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Fonts adds 0 ms
0 msGoogle Fonts costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 472 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 198 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
65 KiBAbout 65 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 84 ms
84 msYour server sent the HTML in 84 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.4 s
5.4 sReal visitors wait 5.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 695 ms
695 msReal visitors wait 695 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 4.2 s
4.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 11.0 s
11.0 sThe first text or image appears after 11.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 12.2 s
12.2 sYour largest element takes 12.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 31.1 s
31.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 31.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 13.3 s
13.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.12
0.12For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.12 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 407 ms
407 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 407 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.2 s to 4.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Tap response (INP) got 24% faster for real visitors
-24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 610 ms to 463 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.008
0.008The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.008, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.1 MB in 167 requests
6.1 MBYour homepage downloads 6.1 MB in 167 requests on a phone: scripts 2.8 MB (77), images 1.7 MB (41) and HTML 600 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.72 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.72 g of CO₂e: 206.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 checks passed
13 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 14 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 13 passed and 1 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
robots.txt blocks all crawlers
Your robots.txt disallows the whole site for every crawler, so search engines are told to stay out.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (9 characters)
Your title is only 9 characters: “Pinterest”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.pinterest.com/v3_sitemaps/seasonal_events_sitemap_20261123_labor_thanksgiving_day_www.pinterest.com.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 71 characters
Your meta description is 71 characters: “Discover recipes, home ideas, style inspiration and other ideas to try.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.pinterest.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 6 AI answer engine crawlers
6 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.pinterest.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
Best practices
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Error handled by React Router default ErrorBoundary: TypeError: Cannot use 'in' operator to search for 'addEventListene…”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 61 words
The homepage has only about 61 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Pinterest Tag (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pinterest.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on pinterest.com, including 19 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.