Website review, no card needed

thomas-henry.de logo

thomas-henry.de website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202628 issues · 75 checks

This review found 28 issues worth fixing on thomas-henry.de, 12 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.0 s2.5 sMay 2Oct 173.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.7 s
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.9 s
Jul 18, 20263.0 s
Jul 25, 20263.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20263.1 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.1 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.4 s
Sep 26, 20263.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.8 s
Oct 10, 20263.8 s
Oct 17, 20263.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
121 ms111 msMay 2Oct 17120 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026117 ms
May 9, 2026114 ms
May 16, 2026114 ms
May 23, 2026113 ms
May 30, 2026114 ms
Jun 6, 2026113 ms
Jun 13, 2026112 ms
Jun 20, 2026112 ms
Jun 27, 2026114 ms
Jul 4, 2026117 ms
Jul 11, 2026118 ms
Jul 18, 2026118 ms
Jul 25, 2026115 ms
Aug 1, 2026115 ms
Aug 8, 2026117 ms
Aug 15, 2026116 ms
Aug 22, 2026116 ms
Aug 29, 2026115 ms
Sep 5, 2026115 ms
Sep 12, 2026115 ms
Sep 19, 2026113 ms
Sep 26, 2026112 ms
Oct 3, 2026113 ms
Oct 10, 2026116 ms
Oct 17, 2026120 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of thomas-henry.de (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. thomas-henry.de at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. thomas-henry.de at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. thomas-henry.de at 2.0 s2.0 s
  4. thomas-henry.de at 2.7 s2.7 s
  5. thomas-henry.de at 3.3 s3.3 s
  6. thomas-henry.de at 4.0 s4.0 s
  7. thomas-henry.de at 4.7 s4.7 s
  8. thomas-henry.de at 5.3 s5.3 s

Speed

5 to fix80
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    29 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • Main-thread work: 4.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 80

    80/100

    Your mobile performance score is 80 (desktop: 78). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 288 KiB

    38 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (288 KiB).

  • Font display

    400 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 400 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 24 KiB

    About 24 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 153 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    138 KiB

    About 138 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Improve image delivery

    11 KiB

    2 images could be 11 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    7 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 7 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 82 ms

    82 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 82 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Real visitors wait 4.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 8.3 s

    8.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 33% slower for real visitors

    +33%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Time to Interactive: 6.9 s

    6.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 6.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 26 images without width and height

    26 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Your largest element takes 3.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below. Most of its time is resource load delay (3.5 s).

  • Total Blocking Time: 256 ms

    256 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 256 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 117 ms to 120 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 162 ms

    162 ms

    Real visitors wait 162 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.014

    0.014

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.014, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 6.1 MB in 113 requests

    6.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.1 MB in 113 requests on a phone: images 5.5 MB (30), scripts 445 KiB (44) and stylesheets 98 KiB (33). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    435 KiB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example TH_BL_02l_o_Hintergrund-scaled.png at 774 px wide, shown at 97 px. Resized copies would save about 435 KiB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (230 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (159 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.74 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.74 g of CO₂e: 209.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9196
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 13 links without text

    13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 27 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 35 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 35 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 0 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Born In Bars.” and “Liquid Edit”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 61 internal links, 25 external

    The homepage links to 61 pages on thomas-henry.de and 25 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 125 characters

    Your meta description is 125 characters: “Thomas Henry steht für Modern Drinking: Bar Classics & Lemonades für Aperitif, Highballs & alkoholfreie Drinks. Born in…”.

  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Thomas Henry - BORN IN BARS | Bar Classics & Lemonades”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.thomas-henry.de/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.thomas-henry.de/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.thomas-henry.de/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,017 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.thomas-henry.de/bar-classics, https://www.thomas-henry.de/lemonades and https://www.thomas-henry.de/zero-sugar have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://www.thomas-henry.de/zero-sugar and https://www.thomas-henry.de/produkte/cherry-blossom-tonic took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 39 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9684
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.thomas-henry.de/.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    13 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 312 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 312 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Download”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at thomas-henry.de, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 28 issues on thomas-henry.de, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25