Website review, no card needed

trcp.org logo

trcp.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202656 issues · 93 checks

This review found 56 issues worth fixing on trcp.org, 23 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.3 s3.1 sMay 2Oct 173.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.9 s
May 9, 20263.9 s
May 16, 20264.0 s
May 23, 20263.9 s
May 30, 20263.9 s
Jun 6, 20264.2 s
Jun 13, 20264.2 s
Jun 20, 20264.1 s
Jun 27, 20264.1 s
Jul 4, 20264.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.6 s
Jul 18, 20263.6 s
Jul 25, 20263.6 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 8, 20263.6 s
Aug 15, 20263.7 s
Aug 22, 20263.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.7 s
Sep 5, 20263.5 s
Sep 12, 20263.4 s
Sep 19, 20263.4 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.3 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Oct 17, 20263.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
151 ms88 msMay 2Oct 17144 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026112 ms
May 9, 2026112 ms
May 16, 2026105 ms
May 23, 2026104 ms
May 30, 2026105 ms
Jun 6, 202696 ms
Jun 13, 202695 ms
Jun 20, 202696 ms
Jun 27, 202698 ms
Jul 4, 2026101 ms
Jul 11, 2026136 ms
Jul 18, 2026129 ms
Jul 25, 2026121 ms
Aug 1, 2026121 ms
Aug 8, 2026120 ms
Aug 15, 2026127 ms
Aug 22, 2026123 ms
Aug 29, 2026121 ms
Sep 5, 2026131 ms
Sep 12, 2026129 ms
Sep 19, 2026137 ms
Sep 26, 2026138 ms
Oct 3, 2026138 ms
Oct 10, 2026142 ms
Oct 17, 2026144 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of trcp.org (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. trcp.org at 1.8 s1.8 s
  2. trcp.org at 3.6 s3.6 s
  3. trcp.org at 5.4 s5.4 s
  4. trcp.org at 7.2 s7.2 s
  5. trcp.org at 9.0 s9.0 s
  6. trcp.org at 10.9 s10.9 s
  7. trcp.org at 12.7 s12.7 s
  8. trcp.org at 14.5 s14.5 s

Speed

18 to fix26
  • Improve image delivery

    10.8 s · 4.9 MB

    18 images could be 4.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.4 s · 7.8 MB

    About 7.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.3 s · 1.4 MB

    45 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.4 MB).

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    2.5 s · 3.0 MB

    3.0 MB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3.6 s · 710 KiB

    710 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Render-blocking requests

    4.0 s

    30 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.0 s.

  • Google CDN adds 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Google CDN costs a phone 1.8 s of main-thread work and 4.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • YouTube adds 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    YouTube costs a phone 1.5 s of main-thread work and 4.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 16.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 16.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 10.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • cloudfront.net adds 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    cloudfront.net costs a phone 1.3 s of main-thread work and 695 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 26

    26/100

    Your mobile performance score is 26. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 4,454 HTML elements

    The page has 4,454 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, YouTube and cloudfront.net and others), adding 11.1 MB and 6.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    740 ms · 277 KiB

    About 277 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 740 ms faster on a phone.

  • Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 352 ms

    352 ms

    Other Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 352 ms of main-thread work and 537 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • csidetm.com adds 339 ms

    339 ms

    csidetm.com costs a phone 339 ms of main-thread work and 15 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 335 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    300 ms · 17 KiB

    17 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    100 ms · 42 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 11.6 s

    11.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 11.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 53.9 s

    53.9 s

    Your largest element takes 53.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “…”.

  • Speed Index: 30.9 s

    30.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 30.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 94.8 s

    94.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 94.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 3.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 28% slower for real visitors

    +28%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 144 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 196 ms

    196 ms

    Real visitors wait 196 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 530 ms

    530 ms

    Real visitors wait 530 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.9 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix43
  • Page weight: 29.9 MB in 422 requests

    29.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 29.9 MB in 422 requests on a phone: images 13.9 MB (139), scripts 10.7 MB (85) and other files 2.3 MB (91). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 26 images in older formats

    26 images (1.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (295 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    4 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Steven-Rinella-ITA-2.png at 420 px wide, shown at 137 px. Resized copies would save about 4 KiB.

  • About 8.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    8.46 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.46 g of CO₂e: 1015.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7788
  • 31 text elements with low contrast

    31 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 4 images without alt text

    4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (25 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 25 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 13 links without text

    13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Frames without titles

    2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h1 → h3 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8586
  • 68 links with vague text

    68 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Title is long (87 characters)

    Your title is 87 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership - Guaranteeing You a Place to Hunt and Fish”.

  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Farm Bill Conservation”, “Step Into The Arena” and “Conservation Economy”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 178 internal links, 26 external

    The homepage links to 178 pages on trcp.org and 26 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 104 characters

    Your meta description is 104 characters: “The TRCP is a 501c3 non-profit corporation that works to preserve the traditions of hunting and fishing.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.trcp.org/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.trcp.org/wp-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.trcp.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (4,660 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix78
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.trcp.org/action-alert/hunters-and-anglers-need-a-strong-bipartisan-farm-bill-in-2025 and https://www.trcp.org/action-alert/hunters-and-anglers-need-a-strong-bipartisan-farm-bill-in-2026 all use the title “Hunters and anglers need a strong, bipartisan Farm Bill in 2026 | The…”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 11 pages without a meta description

    https://www.trcp.org/what/hunting-fishing-access, https://www.trcp.org/unlocking-public-lands, https://www.trcp.org/public-land-access, https://www.trcp.org/chronic-wasting-disease, https://www.trcp.org/sage-grouse-conservation and https://www.trcp.org/2024/10/15/in-the-arena-ryan-sparks and 5 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.trcp.org/action-alert/hunters-and-anglers-need-a-strong-bipartisan-farm-bill-in-2025, whose canonical is https://www.trcp.org/action-alert/hunters-and-anglers-need-a-strong-bipartisan-farm-bill-in-2026. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://www.trcp.org/2023/11/08/in-the-arena-brian-flynn-two-wolf-foundation, https://www.trcp.org/2024/10/15/in-the-arena-ryan-sparks, https://www.trcp.org/2025/09/17/in-the-arena-david-mangum, https://www.trcp.org/action-alert/hunters-and-anglers-need-a-strong-bipartisan-farm-bill-in-2025 and https://www.trcp.org/action-alert/hunters-and-anglers-need-a-strong-bipartisan-farm-bill-in-2026 have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 63 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7385
  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 23 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • About 633 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 633 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 84 calls to action

    The homepage has 84 calls to action, for example “Learn More About Access”, “Learn More” and “Sign Up For Forage Fish Updates”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 37 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 37 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at trcp.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Hotjar

Company

Founded
2000
Headquarters
Washington, D.C.

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 56 issues on trcp.org, including 28 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25