tre.se website review

About 512 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (206 KiB).

Your mobile performance score is 44 (desktop: 72). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 305 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

Polyfills for old browsers add 14 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

3 third-party services load with your homepage (Trust Pilot, Optimizely and ctfassets.net), adding 400 KiB and 52 ms of main-thread time.

2 images could be 60 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

Desktop scores 72 but mobile only 44. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

The first text or image appears after 8.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

Your largest element takes 11.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

The page becomes fully interactive after 11.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

Visually, the page fills in at 8.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

Scripts block taps and scrolling for 512 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 154 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Your homepage downloads 2.3 MB in 112 requests on a phone: scripts 1.3 MB (57), fonts 514 KiB (7) and other files 360 KiB (31). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

Bildbank_2026_-_Konsument_-_1920x1080_-_26.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.66 g of CO₂e: 79.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

The homepage links to 59 pages on tre.se and 3 external pages.

There is no https://www.tre.se/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

https://www.tre.se/mitt3 is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

https://www.tre.se/tillbehor has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 42 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 of 22 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

Large scripts ship without source maps.

On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

The homepage carries about 450 words of visible text.

No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.