Website review, no card needed
treasure.ai website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202637 issues · 81 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on treasure.ai, 14 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 108 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 104 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 159 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
13.4 s · 2.9 MB6 images could be 2.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 13.4 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.4 s · 877 KiB54 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (877 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.3 s · 763 KiBAbout 763 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 28
28/100Your mobile performance score is 28 (desktop: 48). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.0 s
A phone's processor spends 4.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Facebook and others), adding 1.8 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.
Render-blocking requests
950 ms9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.
Google Tag Manager adds 780 ms
780 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 780 ms of main-thread work and 886 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 43 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 43 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
18 long tasks on the main thread
18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 294 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Hotjar adds 273 ms
273 msHotjar costs a phone 273 ms of main-thread work and 67 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 248 ms
248 msFacebook costs a phone 248 ms of main-thread work and 307 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 54 KiBAbout 54 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 31.1 s
31.1 sYour largest element takes 31.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Move at the Speed of Now. Turn customer data into campaigns…”.
Time to Interactive: 31.1 s
31.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 31.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.1 s
5.1 sThe first text or image appears after 5.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.9 s
7.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 963 ms
963 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 963 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.17
0.17For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.17 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 47% slower for real visitors
+47%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 111 ms to 159 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 25% slower for real visitors
+25%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.187
0.187The layout shifts by 0.187 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
6 images without width and height
6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 134 ms
134 msReal visitors wait 134 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 800 ms
800 msReal visitors wait 800 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.0 MB in 133 requests
6.0 MBYour homepage downloads 6.0 MB in 133 requests on a phone: images 3.4 MB (35), scripts 2.1 MB (41) and fonts 410 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
38 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example logo3d-red.png at 906 px wide, shown at 171 px. Resized copies would save about 38 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (56 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.70 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.70 g of CO₂e: 203.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
87 form fields without a label
87 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h6, h1 → h3 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 67 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (68 characters)
Your title is 68 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Treasure AI | Agentic Experience Platform (AEP) for Modern Marketers”.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Move at the Speed of Now.” and “The Treasure AI advantage”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (248 characters)
Your meta description is 248 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
134 internal links, 13 external
The homepage links to 134 pages on treasure.ai and 13 external pages.
5 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.treasure.ai/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: FAQPage, Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.treasure.ai/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Parts of the site are closed to 1 AI crawler
Your robots.txt lets Perplexity (PerplexityBot) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.
3 checks passed
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (742 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.treasure.ai/llms.txt (2 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without an H1
https://www.treasure.ai/security has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 64 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
9 small tap targets
9 of 15 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 480 words of copy
The homepage carries about 480 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Try Now”.
12 calls to action
The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Get Started” and “Contact Us”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 5 testimonial or review blocks, 41 customer or partner logos and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
10 trackers load before any consent
10Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and HubSpot and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
17 cookies set on arrival
17Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
48 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 48 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at treasure.ai, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- HubSpot CMS
- Framework
- React
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on treasure.ai, including 24 speed issues and 4 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.