Website review, no card needed

unirac.com logo

unirac.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202621 issues · 77 checks

This review found 21 issues worth fixing on unirac.com, 7 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.2 s1.8 sMay 9Oct 242.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.6 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20263.1 s
Aug 15, 20264.0 s
Aug 22, 20264.8 s
Aug 29, 20265.3 s
Sep 5, 20265.7 s
Sep 12, 20265.4 s
Sep 19, 20264.8 s
Sep 26, 20264.7 s
Oct 3, 20264.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.7 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
133 ms104 msMay 9Oct 24120 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026121 ms
May 16, 2026112 ms
May 23, 2026121 ms
May 30, 2026130 ms
Jun 6, 2026123 ms
Jun 13, 2026130 ms
Jun 20, 2026125 ms
Jun 27, 2026112 ms
Jul 4, 2026107 ms
Jul 11, 2026117 ms
Jul 18, 2026110 ms
Jul 25, 2026110 ms
Aug 1, 2026110 ms
Aug 8, 2026108 ms
Aug 15, 2026108 ms
Aug 22, 2026112 ms
Aug 29, 2026111 ms
Sep 5, 2026112 ms
Sep 12, 2026124 ms
Sep 19, 2026121 ms
Sep 26, 2026128 ms
Oct 3, 2026130 ms
Oct 10, 2026121 ms
Oct 17, 2026125 ms
Oct 24, 2026120 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of unirac.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. unirac.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. unirac.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. unirac.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. unirac.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. unirac.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. unirac.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. unirac.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. unirac.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

1 to fix64
  • Mobile performance score: 64

    64/100

    Your mobile performance score is 64. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and Google Analytics and others), adding 212 KiB and 321 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    154 KiB

    About 154 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 140 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    73 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (73 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    50 KiB

    About 50 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 548 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 32 ms

    32 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 32 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.947

    0.947

    The layout shifts by 0.947 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 6.9 s

    6.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 6.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Your largest element takes 2.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “BETTER SOLAR STARTS HERE®”. Most of its time is element render delay (1.8 s).

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 121 ms to 120 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 163 ms

    163 ms

    Real visitors wait 163 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 125 ms

    125 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 125 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (31 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.26 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.26 g of CO₂e: 31.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 943 KiB in 23 requests

    943 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 943 KiB in 23 requests on a phone: scripts 309 KiB (4), fonts 283 KiB (3) and images 257 KiB (7). That is a lean page.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 8394
  • 7 buttons without a name

    7 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 8 text elements with low contrast

    8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9298
  • 15 links with vague text

    15 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 120 internal links, 21 external

    The homepage links to 120 pages on unirac.com and 21 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 148 characters

    Your meta description is 148 characters: “Better solar starts here with Unirac. We engineer high-performance solar panel racking systems and provide everything y…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “BETTER SOLAR STARTS HERE®”.

  • Title: 57 characters

    Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Unirac | Leading Solar Panel Racking & Mounting Solutions”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://unirac.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, Person and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://unirac.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://unirac.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (962 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix75
  • 1 page without a title

    https://unirac.com/document/product-catalog has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://unirac.com/document/product-catalog and https://unirac.com/products have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    https://unirac.com/plan-set-design, https://unirac.com/document/product-catalog, https://unirac.com/products, https://unirac.com/products/pitched-roof, https://unirac.com/products/pitched-roof/nxt-umount and https://unirac.com/products/flat-roof have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 69 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    14 of 14 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,018 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,018 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 16 calls to action

    The homepage has 16 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “RMA Request Form” and “Learn More”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at unirac.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Analytics
Google Analytics | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Swcp

Company

Founded
1998
Headquarters
Albuquerque

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 21 issues on unirac.com, including 9 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25
unirac.com website review: scores and fixes | Programmable