Website review, no card needed

zoomcare.com logo

zoomcare.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202625 issues · 86 checks

This review found 25 issues worth fixing on zoomcare.com, 10 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.1 s1.8 sMay 9Oct 242.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.1 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Oct 24, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
105 ms96 msMay 9Oct 24104 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202697 ms
May 16, 202699 ms
May 23, 2026100 ms
May 30, 202698 ms
Jun 6, 2026100 ms
Jun 13, 2026103 ms
Jun 20, 2026102 ms
Jun 27, 2026103 ms
Jul 4, 2026103 ms
Jul 11, 2026101 ms
Jul 18, 2026102 ms
Jul 25, 2026103 ms
Aug 1, 2026103 ms
Aug 8, 2026103 ms
Aug 15, 2026103 ms
Aug 22, 2026102 ms
Aug 29, 2026102 ms
Sep 5, 2026102 ms
Sep 12, 2026103 ms
Sep 19, 2026103 ms
Sep 26, 2026103 ms
Oct 3, 2026104 ms
Oct 10, 2026104 ms
Oct 17, 2026104 ms
Oct 24, 2026104 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of zoomcare.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. zoomcare.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. zoomcare.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. zoomcare.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. zoomcare.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. zoomcare.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. zoomcare.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. zoomcare.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. zoomcare.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix47
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.4 s · 325 KiB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (325 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 216 KiB

    About 216 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 47

    47/100

    Your mobile performance score is 47 (desktop: 97). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    860 ms · 120 KiB

    About 120 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 860 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    350 ms · 51 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 51 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • website-files.com adds 91 ms

    91 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 91 ms of main-thread work and 302 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Adobe TypeKit adds 8 ms

    8 ms

    Adobe TypeKit costs a phone 8 ms of main-thread work and 311 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Other Google APIs/SDKs, website-files.com and cloudfront.net and others), adding 994 KiB and 242 ms of main-thread time.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 24 KiB

    24 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 113 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    34 KiB

    1 image could be 34 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 97 but mobile only 47. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 381 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.9 s

    9.9 s

    Your largest element takes 9.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Healthcare on your schedule. Urgent Care, Primary Care, Spe…”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.0 s

    10.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.3

    0.3

    The layout shifts by 0.3 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 97 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 99 ms

    99 ms

    Real visitors wait 99 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 360 ms

    360 ms

    Real visitors wait 360 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 69 ms

    69 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 69 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.36 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.36 g of CO₂e: 43.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.3 MB in 82 requests

    1.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.3 MB in 82 requests on a phone: scripts 545 KiB (16), fonts 376 KiB (14) and stylesheets 136 KiB (5). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (12 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 5 form fields without a label

    5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 27 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10095
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Healthcare on your schedule.” and “Healthcare on your schedule.”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 74 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 74 pages on zoomcare.com and 7 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 134 characters

    Your meta description is 134 characters: “Healthcare on your schedule. Urgent Care, Primary Care, Specialty Care, and Emergency Care delivered when, where, and h…”.

  • Title: 35 characters

    Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “ZoomCare | Beyond Better Healthcare”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.zoomcare.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: MedicalOrganization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.zoomcare.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (661 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.zoomcare.com/llms.txt (9 KiB, 78 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://www.zoomcare.com/location/portland, https://www.zoomcare.com/location/salem, https://www.zoomcare.com/location/eugene, https://www.zoomcare.com/location/seattle and https://www.zoomcare.com/location/vancouver have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 6 pages with very little text

    https://www.zoomcare.com/locations, https://www.zoomcare.com/location/portland, https://www.zoomcare.com/location/salem, https://www.zoomcare.com/location/eugene, https://www.zoomcare.com/location/seattle and https://www.zoomcare.com/location/vancouver have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 47 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://d2p22nex8covni.cloudfront.net/prod/next/condition-selector.css?v=20261026' from or…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 6 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 542 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 542 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Schedule now” and “Schedule clinic visit”.

  • 13 calls to action

    The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Schedule now”, “Pricing & Insurance” and “Schedule clinic visit”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: PostHog.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 5 phone links and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at zoomcare.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
PostHog
Hosting
Webflow

Company

Founded
2006
Headquarters
Portland

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 25 issues on zoomcare.com, including 14 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25