Website review, no card needed

zooyork.com logo

zooyork.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202631 issues · 70 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on zooyork.com, 12 of them high impact, across 70 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.5 s2.7 sMay 2Oct 173.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20264.3 s
May 9, 20264.1 s
May 16, 20264.3 s
May 23, 20264.2 s
May 30, 20264.3 s
Jun 6, 20264.3 s
Jun 13, 20264.2 s
Jun 20, 20263.9 s
Jun 27, 20263.6 s
Jul 4, 20263.4 s
Jul 11, 20263.2 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20263.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.2 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.5 s
Oct 10, 20263.7 s
Oct 17, 20263.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
102 ms91 msMay 2Oct 1796 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202695 ms
May 9, 202697 ms
May 16, 202698 ms
May 23, 2026101 ms
May 30, 2026100 ms
Jun 6, 202697 ms
Jun 13, 202696 ms
Jun 20, 202694 ms
Jun 27, 202695 ms
Jul 4, 202695 ms
Jul 11, 202695 ms
Jul 18, 202695 ms
Jul 25, 202692 ms
Aug 1, 202694 ms
Aug 8, 202695 ms
Aug 15, 202695 ms
Aug 22, 202696 ms
Aug 29, 202695 ms
Sep 5, 202694 ms
Sep 12, 202695 ms
Sep 19, 202696 ms
Sep 26, 202696 ms
Oct 3, 202698 ms
Oct 10, 202696 ms
Oct 17, 202696 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of zooyork.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. zooyork.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. zooyork.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. zooyork.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. zooyork.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. zooyork.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. zooyork.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. zooyork.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. zooyork.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

4 to fix79
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.7 s

    13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.7 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    850 ms · 292 KiB

    24 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (292 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 79

    79/100

    Your mobile performance score is 79 (desktop: 95). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 149 KiB

    About 149 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 15 KiB

    15 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Cloudflare, Google Fonts and Azure Web Services), adding 212 KiB and 5 ms of main-thread time.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 94 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 12 ms

    12 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Real visitors wait 3.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Your largest element takes 3.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image. Most of its time is resource load delay (2.0 s).

  • Speed Index: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 3.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 96 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 96 ms

    96 ms

    Real visitors wait 96 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (48 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.12 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.12 g of CO₂e: 14.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 438 KiB in 28 requests

    438 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 438 KiB in 28 requests on a phone: stylesheets 171 KiB (11), scripts 131 KiB (12) and images 61 KiB (2). That is a lean page.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9195
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

1 checks passed
  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 8560
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (8 characters)

    Your title is only 8 characters: “Zoo York”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://zooyork.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • Only 4 internal links

    The homepage links to only 4 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

2 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://zooyork.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://zooyork.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://zooyork.com/index.php/privacy-policy and https://zooyork.com/index.php/terms-conditions have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://zooyork.com/index.php/privacy-policy and https://zooyork.com/index.php/terms-conditions have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://zooyork.com/index.php/privacy-policy and https://zooyork.com/index.php/terms-conditions took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 2 internal pages checked

    We fetched 2 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 2 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 2 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 10 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://zooyorknginx-ekaudbf8d7gch6fn.eastus2-01.azurewebsites.net/wp-content/uploads/elem…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix33
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 65 words

    The homepage has only about 65 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at zooyork.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery

Company

Founded
1993
Headquarters
New York City

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on zooyork.com, including 12 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25