Website review, no card needed
miruto.shop website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202642 issues · 84 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on miruto.shop, 15 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 17.8 MB in 276 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76C- #62,312 of 101,636 reviewed websitesbeats 34%
- #39,123 of 56,291 online storesbeats 26%
- #37,043 of 51,174 Shopify storesbeats 23%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 98 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 108 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 158 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.3 s
2.6 s
3.9 s
5.2 s
6.5 s
7.8 s
9.1 s
10.5 s
Speed
Google Tag Manager adds 1.2 s
1.2 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 915 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 38
38/100Your mobile performance score is 38. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.7 s
A phone's processor spends 6.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,631 HTML elements
The page has 3,631 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
4.0 MB20 images could be 4.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, zeals.ai and firebaseapp.com and others), adding 9.6 MB and 1.9 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
910 ms · 595 KiBAbout 595 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 910 ms faster on a phone.
Shopify adds 19 ms
19 msShopify costs a phone 19 ms of main-thread work and 8.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 637 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
zeals.ai adds 478 ms
478 mszeals.ai costs a phone 478 ms of main-thread work and 13 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
190 ms · 26 KiBAbout 26 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 190 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
Use efficient cache lifetimes
39 KiB9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (39 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
19 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 5 ms
5 msYour server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 68.8 s
68.8 sYour largest element takes 68.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 80.0 s
80.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 80.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 13.7 s
13.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s
1.6 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 50% slower for real visitors
+50%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 98 ms to 158 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 39% slower for real visitors
+39%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
38 images without width and height
38 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 101 ms
101 msReal visitors wait 101 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 678 ms
678 msReal visitors wait 678 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 17.8 MB in 276 requests
17.8 MBYour homepage downloads 17.8 MB in 276 requests on a phone: images 7.1 MB (111), fonts 5.7 MB (5) and other files 3.0 MB (108). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
30 images far larger than shown
4.1 MB30 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example animation_cat_toilet.png at 1,030 px wide, shown at 109 px. Resized copies would save about 4.1 MB.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 2.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
36 images below the first screen load straight away
36 images further down the page (5.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
7 images in older formats
7 images (492 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 5.0 g of CO₂ per visit
5.04 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.04 g of CO₂e: 604.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
41 text elements with low contrast
41 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (7 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 274 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (16 characters)
Your title is only 16 characters: “miruto(ミルト)公式サイト”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
196 internal links, 23 external
The homepage links to 196 pages on miruto.shop and 23 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 80 characters
Your meta description is 80 characters: “猫の健康と家族の安心を守る、ペットIoTブランドmiruto(ミルト)の公式サイト。スマートトイレや見守り給餌器で猫の健康状態を記録。猫の元気な毎日を守ります。”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.miruto.shop/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.miruto.shop/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.miruto.shop/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://www.miruto.shop/products/water-dispenser-filter and https://www.miruto.shop/products/filter all use the title “専用フィルター(8個入り) 購入ページ | miruto(ミルト)公式サイト 購入ページ | miruto公式”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.miruto.shop/products/toilet-lala has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.miruto.shop/products/water-dispenser-filter and https://www.miruto.shop/products/filter use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
12 pages with very little text
https://www.miruto.shop/pages/about, https://www.miruto.shop/pages/products, https://www.miruto.shop/pages/products-toilet, https://www.miruto.shop/products/toilet-coco, https://www.miruto.shop/products/water-dispenser-filter and https://www.miruto.shop/pages/products-water-dispenser and 6 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://api.ad-platform.jmty.jp/v1/ev/1?loc=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.miruto.shop%2F&os=iOS&osver=17.5&model=iPhone&browser=Mobile+Safari&tv=1.0.14&evType=pv&aId=tQ1CenHvX5ihvdQzW3HTgdxqPpN9iZ-HuSryQSG7lXk&cl.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “$ is not defined”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
6 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 114 words
The homepage has only about 114 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “CONTACT CONTACT”, “CONTACT” and “BUY / RENTAL BUY / RENTAL”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
22 cookies set on arrival
22Opening the homepage sets 22 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
32 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 32 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at miruto.shop, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 2 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Subscription Test · firebaseapp.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on miruto.shop, including 18 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.