Website review, no card needed

reed.com logo

reed.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202637 issues · 85 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on reed.com, 16 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.1 s2.0 sMay 16Oct 312.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.5 s
Oct 31, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
238 ms185 msMay 16Oct 31232 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026191 ms
May 23, 2026191 ms
May 30, 2026194 ms
Jun 6, 2026198 ms
Jun 13, 2026201 ms
Jun 20, 2026207 ms
Jun 27, 2026212 ms
Jul 4, 2026217 ms
Jul 11, 2026219 ms
Jul 18, 2026210 ms
Jul 25, 2026201 ms
Aug 1, 2026197 ms
Aug 8, 2026200 ms
Aug 15, 2026204 ms
Aug 22, 2026209 ms
Aug 29, 2026211 ms
Sep 5, 2026208 ms
Sep 12, 2026208 ms
Sep 19, 2026215 ms
Sep 26, 2026222 ms
Oct 3, 2026220 ms
Oct 10, 2026220 ms
Oct 17, 2026220 ms
Oct 24, 2026219 ms
Oct 31, 2026232 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of reed.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. reed.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. reed.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. reed.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. reed.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. reed.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  6. reed.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  7. reed.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  8. reed.com at 3.5 s3.5 s

Speed

11 to fix38
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.2 s · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.9 s · 525 KiB

    33 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (525 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 38

    38/100

    Your mobile performance score is 38. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and Facebook and others), adding 2.0 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 783 ms

    783 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 783 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    550 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 550 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 99 KiB

    5 images could be 99 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    450 ms · 57 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 57 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    500 ms

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.

  • 2,995 HTML elements

    The page has 2,995 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 44 KiB

    About 44 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 179 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 538 ms

    538 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 538 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 22.5 s

    22.5 s

    Your largest element takes 22.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Two people in three circles”.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.3 s

    31.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.9 s

    9.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 926 ms

    926 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 926 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 276 ms

    276 ms

    Real visitors wait 276 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 984 ms

    984 ms

    Real visitors wait 984 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors

    +18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 191 ms to 232 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.9 MB in 201 requests

    4.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.9 MB in 201 requests on a phone: scripts 2.9 MB (65), other files 879 KiB (78) and images 526 KiB (45). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (55 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.38 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.38 g of CO₂e: 165.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 9289
  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 6 images without alt text

    6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (5 elements)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (12 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 8598
  • 9 links with vague text

    9 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 201 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 201 pages on reed.com and 13 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 154 characters

    Your meta description is 154 characters: “Looking to hire talent? Reed has access to 18 million CVs and market-leading guarantees. Discover how the UK’s #1 speci…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Your specialist recruitment partner”.

  • Title: 45 characters

    Your title is a healthy 45 characters: “UK’s #1 Specialist Recruitment Company | Reed”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.reed.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.reed.com/sitemap-index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.reed.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,257 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 126 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9278
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=187217346&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=0f16d637-4826-4d0b-b1e9-ebbf10d68182&bo=1&sid=156a1100d9a011f1946877947ce07572&vid=156a4ee0d9a011f1b28d2d44ef3e61b0&vids=1&msclkid=N&gtm_.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Connecting to 'https://vc.hotjar.io/sessions/2533872?s=0.25&r=0.13029976599643356' violates the following Content Secur…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    25 of 26 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix60
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 913 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 913 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Register your CV”, “Sign up to our employer newsletter” and “Download the report”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.

Privacy and tracking

  • 10 trackers load before any consent

    10

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and HubSpot and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 22 cookies set on arrival

    22

    Opening the homepage sets 22 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 47 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 47 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at reed.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Google Cloud

Hiring

Hiring
1 open role
Job board
careers page

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on reed.com, including 21 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25