Website review, no card needed

tecnocomp.com.br logo

tecnocomp.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202637 issues · 79 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on tecnocomp.com.br, 13 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: framerusercontent.com adds 1.6 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.8 s1.2 sMay 9Oct 241.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.3 s
May 16, 20261.5 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.5 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.5 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.6 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
259 ms149 msMay 9Oct 24246 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026237 ms
May 16, 2026188 ms
May 23, 2026206 ms
May 30, 2026219 ms
Jun 6, 2026224 ms
Jun 13, 2026227 ms
Jun 20, 2026191 ms
Jun 27, 2026204 ms
Jul 4, 2026191 ms
Jul 11, 2026186 ms
Jul 18, 2026186 ms
Jul 25, 2026183 ms
Aug 1, 2026183 ms
Aug 8, 2026177 ms
Aug 15, 2026178 ms
Aug 22, 2026177 ms
Aug 29, 2026184 ms
Sep 5, 2026199 ms
Sep 12, 2026199 ms
Sep 19, 2026204 ms
Sep 26, 2026162 ms
Oct 3, 2026203 ms
Oct 10, 2026244 ms
Oct 17, 2026214 ms
Oct 24, 2026246 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tecnocomp.com.br (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tecnocomp.com.br at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. tecnocomp.com.br at 2.1 s2.1 s
  3. tecnocomp.com.br at 3.2 s3.2 s
  4. tecnocomp.com.br at 4.2 s4.2 s
  5. tecnocomp.com.br at 5.3 s5.3 s
  6. tecnocomp.com.br at 6.4 s6.4 s
  7. tecnocomp.com.br at 7.4 s7.4 s
  8. tecnocomp.com.br at 8.5 s8.5 s

Speed

10 to fix58
  • framerusercontent.com adds 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    framerusercontent.com costs a phone 1.6 s of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 7.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 4,383 HTML elements

    The page has 4,383 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (framerusercontent.com, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 3.4 MB and 2.7 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 58

    58/100

    Your mobile performance score is 58 (desktop: 62). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 789 ms

    789 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 789 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    854 KiB

    About 854 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 434 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    347 KiB

    34 images could be 347 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    307 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (307 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 66 ms

    66 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 66 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.3 s

    23.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 6.4 s

    6.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 246 ms

    246 ms

    Real visitors wait 246 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Your largest element takes 3.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Impulsionamos”.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 237 ms to 246 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% slower for real visitors

    +16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 735 ms

    735 ms

    Real visitors wait 735 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.052

    0.052

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.052, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.5 MB in 196 requests

    3.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 196 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (73), images 788 KiB (70) and fonts 372 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (54 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.99 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.99 g of CO₂e: 118.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8893
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 18 tap targets too small

    18 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (22 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 11 form fields without a label

    11 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h3 → h6 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 102 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 5 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10076
  • Title is short (16 characters)

    Your title is only 16 characters: “Tecnocomp - Home”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Impulsionamos negócios por meio da inovação e tec…”, “Impulsionamos e transformamosnegócios por meio da…” and “Impulsionamos negócios por meio da inovação e tec…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (215 characters)

    Your meta description is 215 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 295 internal links, 24 external

    The homepage links to 295 pages on tecnocomp.com.br and 24 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.tecnocomp.com.br/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tecnocomp.com.br/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.tecnocomp.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,385 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 8 pages without an H1

    https://www.tecnocomp.com.br/segmentos/industria, https://www.tecnocomp.com.br/segmentos/varejo, https://www.tecnocomp.com.br/segmentos/governo, https://www.tecnocomp.com.br/segmentos/educacao, https://www.tecnocomp.com.br/segmentos/logistica and https://www.tecnocomp.com.br/segmentos/agro and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 32 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 8891
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Assertion Error: nextVariant should be defined B (https://framerusercontent.com/sites/4TbKu6VbxwwUdIF7Eo1rnw/framer.Bk_…”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    34 of 35 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • A 20-field form

    Your longest form asks for 20 fields (7 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 411 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 411 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 3 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 24 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tecnocomp.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Framer
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Framer

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on tecnocomp.com.br, including 17 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25