Website review, no card needed
tecnocampus.cat website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202641 issues · 86 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on tecnocampus.cat, 18 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.2 s
1.6 s
2.0 s
2.4 s
2.7 s
3.1 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
8.6 s · 10.5 MB37 images could be 10.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.6 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.8 s · 1.7 MB57 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.7 MB).
Render-blocking requests
1.8 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.
Mobile performance score: 46
46/100Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3,801 HTML elements
The page has 3,801 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cdn-cookieyes.com and Google Analytics and others), adding 1.1 MB and 886 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 746 ms
746 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 746 ms of main-thread work and 870 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 373 KiBAbout 373 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 483 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 3.3 s
A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Font display
300 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 42 KiBAbout 42 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
20 KiB20 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
14 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 14 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 99 ms
99 msYour server sent the HTML in 99 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 44.3 s
44.3 sYour largest element takes 44.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “TecnoCampus utilitza cookies tècniques, de personalització …”.
Time to Interactive: 45.6 s
45.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 45.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 832 ms
832 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 832 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s
3.0 sThe first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.7 s
5.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
1 checks passed
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 22.3 MB in 151 requests
22.3 MBYour homepage downloads 22.3 MB in 151 requests on a phone: images 21.0 MB (102), scripts 1.1 MB (27) and fonts 162 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 6.3 g of CO₂ per visit
6.32 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.32 g of CO₂e: 758.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
12 buttons without a name
12 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (35 elements)
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 35 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
30 text elements with low contrast
30 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (15 elements)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
6 tap targets too small
6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (54 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 54 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
20 links without text
20 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (6 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (6 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h3 → h5 and h4 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 2 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 11 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (90 characters)
Your title is 90 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “TecnoCampus | Centre universitari adscrit a la Universitat Pompeu Fabra i Parc empresarial”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
12 links crawlers can't follow
12 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
209 internal links, 156 external
The homepage links to 209 pages on tecnocampus.cat and 156 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 144 characters
Your meta description is 144 characters: “El TecnoCampus és un centre adscrit a la Universitat Pompeu Fabra, un Parc Empresarial i incubadora d'empreses, així co…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Estudis universitaris en tecnologies, audiovisuals, videojocs, empresa i salut enfocats al món professional i l’emprene…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://tecnocampus.cat/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebPage.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://tecnocampus.cat/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://tecnocampus.cat/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (10,603 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
9 pages without a meta description
https://tecnocampus.cat/redirect-minors, https://tecnocampus.cat/altres-programes-formatius/tecnocampus-senior-rd, https://tecnocampus.cat/estudia/formacio-mida-rd, https://tecnocampus.cat/estudia/informacio-academica-rd, https://tecnocampus.cat/estudia/presentacio-dels-serveis-de-mobilitat-internacional-rd and https://tecnocampus.cat/recursos-emprenedoria and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
6 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 6 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://tecnocampus.cat/redirect-minors, whose canonical is https://tecnocampus.cat/minors. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 144 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
19 small tap targets
19 of 30 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
A 8-field form
Your longest form asks for 8 fields (7 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 10,340 words of copy
The homepage carries about 10,340 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
12 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: CookieYes
A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tecnocampus.cat, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Drupal
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- CloudFront
Company
- Founded
- 1982
- Headquarters
- TecnoCampus
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on tecnocampus.cat, including 17 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.