Website review, no card needed

tecnotri.com.br logo

tecnotri.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202639 issues · 79 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on tecnotri.com.br, 11 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 11.9 MB in 142 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s1.6 sMay 2Oct 172.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.1 s
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.1 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.1 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
206 ms145 msMay 2Oct 17185 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026153 ms
May 9, 2026152 ms
May 16, 2026154 ms
May 23, 2026160 ms
May 30, 2026164 ms
Jun 6, 2026177 ms
Jun 13, 2026178 ms
Jun 20, 2026169 ms
Jun 27, 2026169 ms
Jul 4, 2026167 ms
Jul 11, 2026161 ms
Jul 18, 2026164 ms
Jul 25, 2026163 ms
Aug 1, 2026162 ms
Aug 8, 2026162 ms
Aug 15, 2026166 ms
Aug 22, 2026169 ms
Aug 29, 2026181 ms
Sep 5, 2026199 ms
Sep 12, 2026188 ms
Sep 19, 2026192 ms
Sep 26, 2026195 ms
Oct 3, 2026180 ms
Oct 10, 2026191 ms
Oct 17, 2026185 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tecnotri.com.br (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tecnotri.com.br at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. tecnotri.com.br at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. tecnotri.com.br at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. tecnotri.com.br at 1.7 s1.7 s
  5. tecnotri.com.br at 2.1 s2.1 s
  6. tecnotri.com.br at 2.5 s2.5 s
  7. tecnotri.com.br at 2.9 s2.9 s
  8. tecnotri.com.br at 3.3 s3.3 s

Speed

10 to fix67
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.1 MB

    13 images could be 2.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Facebook and others), adding 2.3 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 1.3 MB

    83 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.3 MB).

  • Mobile performance score: 67

    67/100

    Your mobile performance score is 67 (desktop: 68). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    941 KiB

    About 941 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 570 ms

    570 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 570 ms of main-thread work and 694 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 385 ms

    385 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 385 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 278 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    23 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    11 KiB

    About 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 401 ms

    401 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 401 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.7 s

    18.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 696 ms

    696 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 696 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 23% slower for real visitors

    +23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 153 ms to 185 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Your largest element takes 3.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “NOVAS POSSIBILIDADES”. Most of its time is element render delay (1.2 s).

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 200 ms

    200 ms

    Real visitors wait 200 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.09

    0.09

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.09, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 11.9 MB in 142 requests

    11.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 11.9 MB in 142 requests on a phone: images 8.8 MB (51), scripts 2.3 MB (42) and other files 362 KiB (24). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 9 images over 500 KB

    9 images weigh 7.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 8 images far larger than shown

    1.5 MB

    8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Blog-3.png at 1,200 px wide, shown at 334 px. Resized copies would save about 1.5 MB.

  • 11 images in older formats

    11 images (8.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (4.9 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.38 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.38 g of CO₂e: 405.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9796
  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (17 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 63 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 2 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10090
  • Title is short (15 characters)

    Your title is only 15 characters: “Home - Tecnotri”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 174 internal links, 22 external

    The homepage links to 174 pages on tecnotri.com.br and 22 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 160 characters

    Your meta description is 160 characters: “Há 25 anos, a Tecnotri é referência em soluções plásticas rotomoldadas, oferecendo produtos para logística e OEM com fo…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “NOVAS POSSIBILIDADES”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://tecnotri.com.br/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://tecnotri.com.br/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://tecnotri.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,296 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 11 pages without a meta description

    https://tecnotri.com.br/a-tecnotri, https://tecnotri.com.br/a-tecnotri/sobre-nos, https://tecnotri.com.br/a-tecnotri/sustentabilidade, https://tecnotri.com.br/a-tecnotri/sustentabilidade/politica-de-troca-e-garantia, https://tecnotri.com.br/cases-de-sucesso and https://tecnotri.com.br/catalogos and 5 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://tecnotri.com.br/a-tecnotri and https://tecnotri.com.br/cases-de-sucesso have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 47 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9671
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=97167905&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=d5c35e3a-46dc-4bd5-a5e1-ae9d61d935c9&bo=1&sid=2990dbc0cd3711f19ca8f730d9a6a941&vid=2990efc0cd3711f1a4fa111b8291ebfb&vids=1&msclkid=N&gtm_t.

  • 10 small tap targets

    10 of 26 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,505 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,505 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Download”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 16 cookies set on arrival

    16

    Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 29 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tecnotri.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on tecnotri.com.br, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25