Website review, no card needed

tomwood.com logo

tomwood.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202643 issues · 81 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on tomwood.com, 16 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s2.6 sMay 9Oct 242.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.7 s
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.8 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.9 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20262.9 s
Oct 3, 20262.9 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20262.8 s
Oct 24, 20262.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
489 ms324 msMay 9Oct 24362 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026456 ms
May 16, 2026463 ms
May 23, 2026450 ms
May 30, 2026454 ms
Jun 6, 2026439 ms
Jun 13, 2026446 ms
Jun 20, 2026462 ms
Jun 27, 2026457 ms
Jul 4, 2026470 ms
Jul 11, 2026460 ms
Jul 18, 2026461 ms
Jul 25, 2026447 ms
Aug 1, 2026425 ms
Aug 8, 2026403 ms
Aug 15, 2026375 ms
Aug 22, 2026352 ms
Aug 29, 2026343 ms
Sep 5, 2026345 ms
Sep 12, 2026352 ms
Sep 19, 2026363 ms
Sep 26, 2026363 ms
Oct 3, 2026366 ms
Oct 10, 2026360 ms
Oct 17, 2026350 ms
Oct 24, 2026362 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tomwood.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tomwood.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. tomwood.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. tomwood.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  4. tomwood.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  5. tomwood.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  6. tomwood.com at 5.3 s5.3 s
  7. tomwood.com at 6.2 s6.2 s
  8. tomwood.com at 7.1 s7.1 s

Speed

13 to fix43
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 598 KiB

    83 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (598 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 43

    43/100

    Your mobile performance score is 43. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, complyauto.com and kbb.com and others), adding 1.1 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    850 ms · 169 KiB

    1 image could be 169 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 850 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 824 ms

    824 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 824 ms of main-thread work and 540 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 471 KiB

    About 471 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 602 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • complyauto.com adds 493 ms

    493 ms

    complyauto.com costs a phone 493 ms of main-thread work and 161 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 197 KiB

    About 197 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • kbb.com adds 236 ms

    236 ms

    kbb.com costs a phone 236 ms of main-thread work and 356 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,941 HTML elements

    The page has 1,941 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 48 ms

    48 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 48 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.9 s

    7.9 s

    Your largest element takes 7.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “blank gif”.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.8 s

    15.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 238 ms

    238 ms

    Real visitors wait 238 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 22 images without width and height

    22 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.05

    0.05

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 23% faster for real visitors

    -23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 456 ms to 362 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 14.1 MB in 126 requests

    14.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 14.1 MB in 126 requests on a phone: media 11.3 MB (1), scripts 1.3 MB (56) and images 738 KiB (25). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 4.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.00 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.00 g of CO₂e: 480.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9243
  • Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation (1 element)

    Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 37 images without alt text

    37 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 2 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 6 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 2 passed and 4 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 7785
  • Meta description is long (161 characters)

    Your meta description is 161 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.tomwood.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 78 internal links, 36 external

    The homepage links to 78 pages on tomwood.com and 36 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Tom Wood Auto Group”.

  • Title: 58 characters

    Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “New & Used Car Dealership In Indianapolis | Tom Wood Group”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.tomwood.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: AutomotiveBusiness.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

2 to fix60
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • Parts of the site are closed to 6 AI crawlers

    Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

1 checks passed
  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.tomwood.com/llms.txt (195 KiB, 689 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.tomwood.com/tom-wood-advantage.htm has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 58 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    2 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 2 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7761
  • No mobile viewport

    No viewport meta tag, so phones render the desktop layout zoomed out.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.

Content and conversion

4 to fix63
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Only about 3 words

    The homepage has only about 3 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • 14 calls to action

    The homepage has 14 calls to action, for example “Buy 100% Online”, “Shop with Personalized Payments” and “Insurance Quote”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tomwood.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Cox Enterprises Inc

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on tomwood.com, including 22 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25