Website review, no card needed
multiloja.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202648 issues · 89 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on multiloja.com.br, 15 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 196 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 204 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 212 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 247 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 248 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.7 s
2.6 s
3.4 s
4.3 s
5.1 s
6.0 s
6.9 s
Speed
Main-thread work: 8.6 s
A phone's processor spends 8.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
4,193 HTML elements
The page has 4,193 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 2.0 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 1.3 MB39 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 1.1 MB98 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).
Mobile performance score: 54
54/100Your mobile performance score is 54 (desktop: 75). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
901 KiBAbout 901 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
YouTube adds 722 ms
722 msYouTube costs a phone 722 ms of main-thread work and 977 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 479 ms
479 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 479 ms of main-thread work and 357 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 421 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Facebook adds 307 ms
307 msFacebook costs a phone 307 ms of main-thread work and 281 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 187 KiBAbout 187 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 5 ms
5 msYour server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 26.5 s
26.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 26.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s
1.6 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.5 s
4.5 sYour largest element takes 4.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Fecha mês”.
Real-user INP: 332 ms
332 msReal visitors wait 332 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 24% slower for real visitors
+24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 196 ms to 248 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 5.3 s
5.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.038
0.038The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.038, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.0 MB in 218 requests
7.0 MBYour homepage downloads 7.0 MB in 218 requests on a phone: images 4.2 MB (122), scripts 2.1 MB (39) and fonts 355 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
image is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
9 images far larger than shown
180 KiB9 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Quarto-Modulado-Casal-10-Portas-3-Gavetas-Infinity-Moveis-Ca at 1,000 px wide, shown at 285 px. Resized copies would save about 180 KiB.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (85 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit
1.99 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.99 g of CO₂e: 238.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
10 tap targets too small
10 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (7 elements)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (234 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 234 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
40 form fields without a label
40 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
16 links without text
16 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Os melhores produtos para você e sua casa com pre…” and “Os melhores produtos para você e sua casa com pre…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
147 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 147 pages on multiloja.com.br and 9 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 112 characters
Your meta description is 112 characters: “Ofertas em móveis, eletrodomésticos, eletrônicos, celulares e muito mais! Compre em até 10x sem juros no cartão.”.
Title: 56 characters
Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Multiloja: Móveis, Eletro, Portáteis e Mais! | Multiloja”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.multiloja.com.br/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
Some text only appears after JavaScript runs
52%The HTML your server sends has 656 of the 1,254 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.multiloja.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://www.multiloja.com.br/torra-torra has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
4 pages share 2 titles
/ and https://www.multiloja.com.br/wishlist all use the title “Multiloja: Móveis, Eletro, Portáteis e Mais! | Multiloja”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
9 pages share a meta description
https://www.multiloja.com.br/fecha-mes-outubro, https://www.multiloja.com.br/wishlist, https://www.multiloja.com.br/pronta-entrega, https://www.multiloja.com.br/torra-torra, https://www.multiloja.com.br/moveis/cozinha and https://www.multiloja.com.br/moveis/sala-de-estar and 3 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.multiloja.com.br/fecha-mes-outubro, whose canonical is https://www.multiloja.com.br/fecha-mes-outubro?page=1. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 pages without an H1
https://www.multiloja.com.br/fecha-mes-outubro, https://www.multiloja.com.br/wishlist, https://www.multiloja.com.br/pronta-entrega, https://www.multiloja.com.br/torra-torra, https://www.multiloja.com.br/moveis and https://www.multiloja.com.br/moveis/quarto and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 97 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://api.reclameaqui.com.br/embed-reputation/hash/Mjg0NjU6bXVsdGlsb2phLWxvamEtdmlydHVhb…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
139 of 154 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,254 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,254 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
18 cookies set on arrival
18Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
39 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 39 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at multiloja.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Azure
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on multiloja.com.br, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.